1988
DOI: 10.1002/ajim.4700130102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of smoking in occupational epidemiologic studies: Methods and needs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to these further evaluations, our results should be interpreted cautiously, given the possibility of residual confounding. However, previous reports have found few examples of confounding by tobacco use and occupational risk of cancer (45,46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to these further evaluations, our results should be interpreted cautiously, given the possibility of residual confounding. However, previous reports have found few examples of confounding by tobacco use and occupational risk of cancer (45,46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This finding suggests either that adjustment by the ever-never use of tobacco and alcohol is completely ineffective or that odds ratios by occupation and industry are not confounded by tobacco and alcohol patterns. We do not believe there is a serious problem of residual confounding because (i) in the face of real confounding it is unlikely that ever-never adjustment would have no effect, (ii) adjustment by the level of use among the subgroup that had such information gave odds ratios nearly identical to those from the ever-never adjustment, and (iii) previous reports in the literature have found few examples of confounding of occupational cancer risks by tobacco use (42,43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some authors have suggested that the potential confounding effect of smoking is modest unless the smoking habits of a study population are quite extreme (Blair et al 1988), a number of methods have been proposed for assessing the impact of smoking in epidemiologic research (Axelson and Steenland 1988). If smoking rates are high, a consistent increase in all smoking related diseases might be expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%