2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of somatic membrane potential in nociceptive neurons and its implications for peripheral nociceptive transmission

Abstract: SummaryWe identified major ion channels influencing the resting membrane potential of nociceptive sensory neurons and demonstrated that changes of somatic/perisomatic membrane potential of these neurons can strongly influence peripheral nociceptive transmission.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
162
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
8
162
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These computer simulations in combination with our experimental findings in DRG neurons and on isolated M-channels suggest that PUFA-induced augmentation of the M-current contributes to the anti-excitable effect of PUFAs. This is further supported by a comparison of the PUFA effects found in the present work and previously reported effects of the clinically approved M-channel opener retigabine; the PUFA effects on the resting membrane potential and the firing threshold in DRG neurons, and on the voltage dependence of the isolated human M-channel expressed in Xenopus oocytes are, on the whole, similar to, but quantitatively smaller than, the effect of retigabine (Main et al 2000;Zheng et al 2013;Du et al 2014). Our finding that DHA methyl ester and oleic acid were ineffective suggests that possible anti-excitable effects of PUFA methyl esters and monounsaturated fatty acids are not mediated via the M-channel.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These computer simulations in combination with our experimental findings in DRG neurons and on isolated M-channels suggest that PUFA-induced augmentation of the M-current contributes to the anti-excitable effect of PUFAs. This is further supported by a comparison of the PUFA effects found in the present work and previously reported effects of the clinically approved M-channel opener retigabine; the PUFA effects on the resting membrane potential and the firing threshold in DRG neurons, and on the voltage dependence of the isolated human M-channel expressed in Xenopus oocytes are, on the whole, similar to, but quantitatively smaller than, the effect of retigabine (Main et al 2000;Zheng et al 2013;Du et al 2014). Our finding that DHA methyl ester and oleic acid were ineffective suggests that possible anti-excitable effects of PUFA methyl esters and monounsaturated fatty acids are not mediated via the M-channel.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…M channels are expressed in mammalian somatosensory neurons (especially in pain or nociceptive neurons) and are important for the control of their resting excitability (29,30), ultimately controlling nociceptive signaling (reviewed in ref. 31).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DRG neurons were cultured as described previously [22,23,24]. Briefly, adult Sprague Dawley rats (170 g-180 g) were humanly euthanized by isoflurane overdose.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, adult Sprague Dawley rats (170 g-180 g) were humanly euthanized by isoflurane overdose. DRGs from all spinal levels were extracted and dissociated using collagenase/dispase method as described [22,23,24]. Dissociated cells we cultured in DMEN supplemented with GlutaMax I, 10 % fetal calf serum, penicillin (50 U/ml) and streptomycin (50 g/ml) on glass coverslips coated with poly-D-lysine for 2-5 days in a humidified incubator (37°C, 5% CO2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%