2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11099-018-0768-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of the maximal chlorophyll fluorescence yield by the Q<sub>B</sub> binding site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value at room temperature and at 5°C varied from batch to batch between about 45 and 60% and about 35 and 45%, respectively; the F v /F m parameter under the same conditions was 0.845 ± 0.035 (n = 9, obtained from five different batches; data not shown). These observations are in good agreement with the data reported earlier on PSII CC by Magyar et al () and in reasonable accordance with observations on thylakoid membranes (Joliot and Joliot , Prášil et al ). By using a second STSF, the fluorescence level could be further raised, by about another 15% – but only after a sufficiently long Δt waiting time between the two flashes, and further excitations were required to reach the maximum level F m ; here MTSF excitation was used (the second MTSF laser pulse was applied to confirm that F m was reached).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This value at room temperature and at 5°C varied from batch to batch between about 45 and 60% and about 35 and 45%, respectively; the F v /F m parameter under the same conditions was 0.845 ± 0.035 (n = 9, obtained from five different batches; data not shown). These observations are in good agreement with the data reported earlier on PSII CC by Magyar et al () and in reasonable accordance with observations on thylakoid membranes (Joliot and Joliot , Prášil et al ). By using a second STSF, the fluorescence level could be further raised, by about another 15% – but only after a sufficiently long Δt waiting time between the two flashes, and further excitations were required to reach the maximum level F m ; here MTSF excitation was used (the second MTSF laser pulse was applied to confirm that F m was reached).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It has also been shown, in accordance with earlier literature data obtained on isolated thylakoid membranes (Joliot and Joliot 1979), that only the first STSF leads to stable charge separation (Q A reduction) and the F 1 -to-F 2 and the further fluorescence yield increments are given rise to by different physical mechanisms. Recently, Prášil et al (2018) have shown that variations in the fluorescence yield depend on the occupancy of the Q B binding site and on the capacity of the secondary electron acceptors to re-oxidize the reduced Q A . However, under our experimental conditions, significant participation of Q B could be ruled out (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the original discovery of photochemical and thermal components was made more than 50 years ago (Morin 1964 ; Delosme 1967 ), still no general consensus has been reached on the interpretation of the thermal phase (for a variety of different views, see e.g. Lazar 2006 ; Schansker et al 2011 ; Stirbet and Govindjee 2012 ; Prasil et al 2018 ; Laisk and Oja 2020 ). On the other hand, it is generally accepted that the O - I 1 rise specifically reflects the closure of PS II reaction centers and, hence, may be considered to reflect photosystem II emission, F (II), only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first stage of the assay to test the system, an exogenous electron acceptor, DMBQ, is introduced to the membranes at a relatively high concentration, to replace the natural electron carriers (PQ) which are likely to be saturated. [ 31 ] If DMBQ successfully accepts electrons from PSII, the level of Chl fluorescence should be reduced in its presence compared to its absence, because excitation energy can be used to eject electrons rather than being reemitted. In the final stage of the assay, “hydroxylamine” can be added as an aqueous solution and is known to increase the Chl fluorescence again (Figure 6a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%