1997
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.17.9.5255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of the Translational Efficiency of β-ATPase mRNA Depends on the Regulation of a Protein That Binds the 3′ Untranslated Region of the mRNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
152
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
16
152
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5). Post-transcriptional regulation is not limited to changes in message stability, and sequences within the 3Ј-UTR of mRNAs have also been shown to be important for enhancing message translation as well as for translational silencing (45,75,76). Because the 3Ј-UTR of murine cox-2 also contains multiple regulatory elements that alter message stability and translational efficiency (45), results from the assay system we employed for the present study collectively reflect post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms but do not differentiate translational efficiency or translational silencing from message stabilization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). Post-transcriptional regulation is not limited to changes in message stability, and sequences within the 3Ј-UTR of mRNAs have also been shown to be important for enhancing message translation as well as for translational silencing (45,75,76). Because the 3Ј-UTR of murine cox-2 also contains multiple regulatory elements that alter message stability and translational efficiency (45), results from the assay system we employed for the present study collectively reflect post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms but do not differentiate translational efficiency or translational silencing from message stabilization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The localization of mRNAs also exerts a fundamental role in the regulation of gene expression (Martin and Ephrussi, 2009). Mechanisms that control the localization (Lithgow et al, 1997;Marc et al, 2002) and translation (de Heredia et al, 2000;Izquierdo and Cuezva, 1997;Martinez-Diez et al, 2006) of nucleus-encoded mRNAs of mitochondria have been shown to define the bioenergetic phenotype of the cell. The sorting of mRNAs to the vicinity of mitochondria is a conserved feature in both yeast and mammalian cells (Lithgow et al, 1997;Sylvestre et al, 2003b) affecting those mRNAs that encode core components of mitochondrial complexes Marc et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But putatively the di erent HMGA1 3'UTR regions may be involved in post-transcriptional processes regulating the expression of HMGA1. Conceivably they can promote degradation similar to the elements within the 3'UTR of HMGA2 or they can provide target sites for RNA-binding proteins that activate (Fajardo et al, 1997) or inhibit (Izquierdo and Cuezva, 1997) translation. But further experiments will have to be done to ®nd out more about the function of the putative regulatory elements within the 3'UTR of both HMGA genes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%