2022
DOI: 10.1017/wet.2022.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) at multiple locations in Illinois with single preemergence applications of VLCFA-inhibiting herbicides

Abstract: Very-long-chain fatty acid (VLCFA)-inhibiting herbicides have been widely used for preemergence control of annual monocot and small-seeded dicot weed species, such as waterhemp, since their discovery in the 1950s. VLCFA-inhibiting herbicides are often applied in combination with active ingredients that possess residual activity on small-seeded broadleaf weeds, which can make their contribution to preemergence waterhemp control difficult to quantify. Bareground field experiments were designed to investigate the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, segregation of F 2 -♀ lines best fits a two-locus model of 9:7 (R:S), consistent with two complementary genes wherein one homozygous recessive locus (rr) interacts with dominant allele(s) at a different locus (R-) controlling resistance (Bernardo 2014; Falconer 1989). The most plausible biochemical explanation for the single, dominant gene model is that S -metolachlor resistance in SIR is conferred by a single P450 gene encoding a P450 enzyme that rapidly detoxifies the herbicide (Strom et al 2020, 2021). However, the two-gene model described above is consistent with a single P450 gene that primarily confers resistance, but a second recessive gene (if homozygous) decreases the magnitude of S -metolachlor resistance by an unknown mechanism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…By contrast, segregation of F 2 -♀ lines best fits a two-locus model of 9:7 (R:S), consistent with two complementary genes wherein one homozygous recessive locus (rr) interacts with dominant allele(s) at a different locus (R-) controlling resistance (Bernardo 2014; Falconer 1989). The most plausible biochemical explanation for the single, dominant gene model is that S -metolachlor resistance in SIR is conferred by a single P450 gene encoding a P450 enzyme that rapidly detoxifies the herbicide (Strom et al 2020, 2021). However, the two-gene model described above is consistent with a single P450 gene that primarily confers resistance, but a second recessive gene (if homozygous) decreases the magnitude of S -metolachlor resistance by an unknown mechanism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible a VLCFAE inhibitor–resistant population existed at the McLean County, Stanford, Illinois, site before field scouts noticed the lack of chemical control, particularly because S -metolachlor is typically not used alone for managing A. tuberculatus (Strom et al 2022). Furthermore, resistant waterhemp may have occurred before Group 5 (PSII inhibitors; e.g., atrazine and simazine) and Group 27 herbicides (HPPD inhibitors; e.g., mesotrione, topramezone, tembotrione) no longer controlled weed escapes (Hausman et al 2011; Strom et al 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Biomass and survival data per study were pooled since the O'Brien test for homogeneity of variance for repeated experiments was not significant. Survival and biomass data were analyzed using a three-parameter logistic regression model y ¼ d 1þexpfb½logðxÞÀ logðeÞ�g [62], where d is the upper limit, b is the slope of the curve, and e is the 50% reduction in seedling survival (LD 50 ) or 50% reduction in seedling aboveground dry biomass (GR 50 ), in the 'Analysis of Dose-Response Curves', or drc package, in R (Version 3.4.3) and RStudio (Version 1.2.1335) [63]. Lethal dose estimates of 50% (LD 50 ) and growth reduction estimates of 50% (GR 50 ) for each population were obtained from each analysis, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%