2005
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30560-6_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of Yaw Rate and Sideslip in 4-Wheel Steering Cars with Actuator Constraints

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we present a new steering controller for cars equipped with 4-wheel steer-by-wire. The controller commands the front and rear steering angles with the objective of tracking reference yaw rate and sideslip signals corresponding to the desired vehicle handling behaviour. The structure of the controller is based on a simplified model of the lateral dynamics of 4-wheel steering cars. We show that the proposed structure facilitates the design of a robust steering controller valid for varying… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Example 28 An example of how constrained switching can arise in practical situations is given in [170], where the problem of designing a controller to deliver prescribed handling behaviour for a four-wheel steering vehicle is considered. The controller described in [170] operates by manipulating the front and rear steering angles of the vehicle to achieve the desired behaviour.…”
Section: Restricted Switchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Example 28 An example of how constrained switching can arise in practical situations is given in [170], where the problem of designing a controller to deliver prescribed handling behaviour for a four-wheel steering vehicle is considered. The controller described in [170] operates by manipulating the front and rear steering angles of the vehicle to achieve the desired behaviour.…”
Section: Restricted Switchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The controller described in [170] operates by manipulating the front and rear steering angles of the vehicle to achieve the desired behaviour. Due to physical considerations, the steering angle of the rear tyres is subject to a tight constraint, and when the maximal allowed steering angle is reached, a change of control action is required leading to an abrupt switch in the overall system dynamics.…”
Section: Restricted Switchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common problem to all 4WS solutions is the fact that the values of both the front and rear steering angles are subject to physical constraints, causing the saturation of the input variables with possible deteriorations of the control performances. An analysis of saturation effects on the stability performances has been introduced in [6]. In addition, as the vehicle operates under a wide range of conditions of speed, load, friction etc., the active control system has to guarantee the safety (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the use of 4WS by wire has been considered, e.g. in [5], where the proposed control structure is able to decouple the control of lateral acceleration and the yaw rate control, and in [6], where individual channel design techniques have been used to design yaw rate and sideslip angle feedbacks. A common problem to all 4WS solutions is the fact that the values of both the front and rear steering angles are subject to physical constraints, causing the saturation of the input variables with possible deteriorations of the control performances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, switching between systems differing by rank one arises in a number of practical applications. For example, in Vilaplana et al (2005) a control system for four-wheel steering vehicles is described which involves switching between a pair of LTI systems differing by rank one whose parameters are subject to interval uncertainty. It should also be noted that this class of systems has received a considerable amount of attention in the literature ; Narendra and Goldwyn (1964); King and Nathanson (2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%