2015
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/7/075303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of zinc oxide nanowire array properties with electron-beam lithography templating for photovoltaic applications

Abstract: Hydrothermally synthesized zinc oxide nanowire arrays have been used as nanostructured acceptors in emerging photovoltaic (PV) devices. The nanoscale dimensions of such arrays allow for enhanced charge extraction from PV active layers, but the device performance critically depends on the nanowire array pitch and alignment. In this study, we templated hydrothermally-grown ZnO nanowire arrays via high-resolution electron-beam-lithography defined masks, achieving the dual requirements of high-resolution patternin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[17] However, the fact that nanowire devices have a lower V OC than planar devices, despite their higher J SC , indicates that recombination at the junction may contribute to additional V OC loss due to the larger interface area in nanowire devices compared to planar devices. [42,43] In conclusion, we have demonstrated a device architecture that combines a ZnO nanowire array OBHJ architecture with band alignment engineering of the PbS QD film to promote charge extraction. [41] Furthermore, while these ZnO nanowire arrays show good alignment and uniformity, further work can be done to optimize the alignment, length and pitch of solution-grown ZnO nanowire arrays on transparent conducting oxides to optimize their current collection and light trapping properties for application in QD PVs.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/aenm201600848mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17] However, the fact that nanowire devices have a lower V OC than planar devices, despite their higher J SC , indicates that recombination at the junction may contribute to additional V OC loss due to the larger interface area in nanowire devices compared to planar devices. [42,43] In conclusion, we have demonstrated a device architecture that combines a ZnO nanowire array OBHJ architecture with band alignment engineering of the PbS QD film to promote charge extraction. [41] Furthermore, while these ZnO nanowire arrays show good alignment and uniformity, further work can be done to optimize the alignment, length and pitch of solution-grown ZnO nanowire arrays on transparent conducting oxides to optimize their current collection and light trapping properties for application in QD PVs.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/aenm201600848mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 Among these approaches, the hydrothermal method and aqueous solution methods are the least expensive and the simplest for synthesizing ZnO nanostructures. The various morphologies of ZnO 1D nanostructures include nanopins, 11 nanorods (NRs), 12 nanotubes, 13 and nanowires (NWs).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among of them, the various morphologies of ZnO include nanodiscs, nanowires (NWs), nanotubes, nanorods (NRs), nanoplates, nanopins, and nanosheets (NSs) have also been fabricated [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] . ZnO nanostructure have many synthetic methods, such as hydrothermal method (HTM), chemical vapor deposition (CVD), aqueous solution methods (ASM), pulsed laser deposition (PLD), electrochemical deposition (ECD), and electron-beam lithography (EBL) 8,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] . Currently, ZnO nanostructures have been applied to optical and electronic devices, such as field-effect transistors (FETs), UV photodetectors (UV PD), light emitting diodes (LEDs), glucose sensors, varistors devices, gas sensors [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%