2014
DOI: 10.1177/1087057113516003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control-Plate Regression (CPR) Normalization for High-Throughput Screens with Many Active Features

Abstract: Systematic error is present in all high-throughput screens, lowering measurement accuracy. Because screening occurs at the early stages of research projects, measurement inaccuracy leads to following up inactive features and failing to follow up active features. Current normalization methods take advantage of the fact that most primary-screen features (e.g., compounds) within each plate are inactive, which permits robust estimates of row and column systematic-error effects. Screens that contain a majority of p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, gene symbols were identified from annotation files, with the use of editing codes. Next, expression profiling of gene symbols was performed by Z-score normalization, as previously described (10). The linear models for microarray data (limma) version 3.28.17 (11) in R-software package () were applied to identify the DEGs among the three mouse groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, gene symbols were identified from annotation files, with the use of editing codes. Next, expression profiling of gene symbols was performed by Z-score normalization, as previously described (10). The linear models for microarray data (limma) version 3.28.17 (11) in R-software package () were applied to identify the DEGs among the three mouse groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average value of multiple probes (that were corresponding to the same gene) was used as the gene expression value. To eliminate inherent expression differences between genes, the gene expression values were performed with Z-score normalization as previously described ( 15 ). Subsequently, the limma package version 3.32.2 in R ( 16 ) was used to screen the DEGs in the Gram-positive and Gram-negative samples compared with the control samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To eliminate inherent variations in gene expression, we used the Z-score correction method [16]. We defined the good prognosis group as the control group, and the poor prognosis group as the case group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%