2018 IEEE International Conference on Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway, Ship Propulsion and Road Vehicles &Amp; Interna 2018
DOI: 10.1109/esars-itec.2018.8607738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control System Design and the Power Management of MEFADEC Assembled on More-Electric Aircraft

Abstract: This paper deals with a novel control system design of More Electric Full Authorized Digital Electronic Control (MEFADEC) on the more electric aircraft. On the base of the analysis of the power management of MEFADEC system, the power of the more electric aircraft is also the vital platform to be considered. The definition of microgrid is introduced in the power management of the MEFADEC. The control law of the MEFADEC is the main course of this paper and some simulations are done to verify the design of the co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…α k and β k are the introduced positive slack variables and M is a column vector in which the elements are very large positive real value.y * k−1 is obtained at the (k-1)-th round of inner-layer problem and is the fixed parameter for (19). From (14) and (16), we can find parts of the formulations in G (x k , y * k−1 ) are nonlinear corresponding to x k with given y * k−1 (the constraints (3), (4), (6), (7), (9.b) and (10)) and parts of the formulation in H 1 (x k ) are nonlinear corresponding to x k (the constraints (11)); for that matter, in order to solve the outer-layer problem, we at first recast the problem in (19) as a linear-approximated MILP formulation and then resort to the commercial optimization software to finally solve it. In this paper we use the linearization method in [29] to represent the strictly decreasing/increasing convex formulations in (3), (4), (6), (7) and (10) and use the linearization method in [30] to linearly approximate the bilinear function in (9.b) and (11).…”
Section: A Outer-layermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…α k and β k are the introduced positive slack variables and M is a column vector in which the elements are very large positive real value.y * k−1 is obtained at the (k-1)-th round of inner-layer problem and is the fixed parameter for (19). From (14) and (16), we can find parts of the formulations in G (x k , y * k−1 ) are nonlinear corresponding to x k with given y * k−1 (the constraints (3), (4), (6), (7), (9.b) and (10)) and parts of the formulation in H 1 (x k ) are nonlinear corresponding to x k (the constraints (11)); for that matter, in order to solve the outer-layer problem, we at first recast the problem in (19) as a linear-approximated MILP formulation and then resort to the commercial optimization software to finally solve it. In this paper we use the linearization method in [29] to represent the strictly decreasing/increasing convex formulations in (3), (4), (6), (7) and (10) and use the linearization method in [30] to linearly approximate the bilinear function in (9.b) and (11).…”
Section: A Outer-layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These works finally verifies its performance with different levels of thrust and electric power demands. In contrast, the papers in [16]- [18] provide a power management/control model to co-optimize the energy output of the more-electric turbofan engine and electric loads. The above approaches for energy optimization analysis are novel but have the following challenges: 1) fixed electric loads provided by turbofan engine are assumed, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%