Control the Capital: Cities and Political Dominance

Abstract

As optimism about the 'third wave' of democratisation has waned in the face of continued and renewed authoritarianism across the world, analyses of authoritarian dominance remain focused primarily on the national scale. We are argue that cities, and especially capital cities, play crucial roles in the production of dominance and the politics of maintaining it, as well as being sites of popular resistance. However, the varying ways in which governing elites deploy their resources and strategies in the urban arena in pursuit of dominance remain underexplored. In this conceptual framing paper for a multi-country comparative study spanning Africa and Asia, we suggest that strategies for urban dominance can be analysed in accordance with two overlapping modalities: interventions that are generative by design (their primary intention is to create some new form of support); and those that are repressive by design (their primary aim is to destroy or inhibit some form of opposition). We then present a typology of strategies that cut across these spheres of intervention and include co-optation, legitimising discourses, legal manoeuvres, coercive distribution and violent coercion. This framework is designed to inform empirical analysis of strategies of urban dominance, how these change over time and how they are deployed in varying combinations, facilitating a deeper understanding of how struggles for control shape urban outcomes.

Militias going rogue: Social dilemmas and coercive brokerage in Rio de Janeiro's urban frontier

“…However, much of the urban focus of political settlements literature has been, so far, on the role of cities in shaping national political settlements (Goodfellow, 2018; Goodfellow & Jackman, 2020; Mitlin, 2020). But there has been less focus on the subnational dimension of political settlements (Meehan & Goodhand, 2018).…”

Understanding the Politics of Covid-19 in Kampala, Nairobi and Mogadishu: A Political Settlements Approach

“…To our knowledge, however, rather few studies to date have explicitly focused on the politics of Covid and the city. To some extent this is surprising, since not only are capital cities -with their high population densities and comparatively well-developed state machineries -key sites in the struggle against rising infections: they are also often arenas of fierce political struggle, playing an outsized role in deciding the fate of political leaders (Collord et al 2021;Goodfellow and Jackman 2020;Mitlin 2020).…”

“…Understanding the politics of Covid-19 in Kampala, Nairobi and Mogadishu: A political settlements approach a tentative contribution to the emerging literature, (a) on the politics of pandemic response and (b) the growing field of political settlements theory -especially that branch concerned with analysing cities (Goodfellow and Jackman 2020;Kelsall et al 2021).…”

“…Goodfellow and Jackman (2020) describe as "generative", constructive policies designed to win legitimacy and support.45 Approximately 144 people may have been killed by police "enforcing Covid-19 restrictions", according to a source at Missing Voices, an effort to document all police killings in Kenya (personal communication via Zoom, March 2022).…”

Drawing the boundaries of ‘good citizenship’ through state-led urban redevelopment in Dikmen Valley

“…More recent studies have also shown that economic goals are not the only or the most important motivations behind urban policy. States might have explicit demographic purposes, such as in Israel (Shmaryahu-Yeshurun and Ben-Porat, 2020) or can use inclusive urban redevelopment programmes to control and dominate, as in some African and Asian cities (Goodfellow and Jackman, 2020).…”