2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2sm00707j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controllable particle migration in liquid crystal flows

Abstract: We observe novel positional control of a colloidal particle in microchannel flow of a nematic liquid crystal. Lattice Boltzmann simulations show multiple equilibrium particle positions, the existence and position of...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be explained with the migration ( i.e. lateral movement perpendicular to the flow direction) to the weak attractor region that we observed in our previous work on controllable particle migration 33 in practically unconfined conditions using a much wider duct and lower confinement ratio 2 R / L x = 0.15. For direct comparison we provide in Table 2 an approximate conversion between particle Ericksen numbers, as used our previous publication, and Ericksen numbers based on the smallest duct dimension, as used in this work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This can be explained with the migration ( i.e. lateral movement perpendicular to the flow direction) to the weak attractor region that we observed in our previous work on controllable particle migration 33 in practically unconfined conditions using a much wider duct and lower confinement ratio 2 R / L x = 0.15. For direct comparison we provide in Table 2 an approximate conversion between particle Ericksen numbers, as used our previous publication, and Ericksen numbers based on the smallest duct dimension, as used in this work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…4, for instance in the third row, and retains a similar shape at higher Ericksen numbers (see images for 2 R / L x = 0.4, Er = 18.10, 2 R / L x = 0.6, Er = 21.25, and 2 R / L x = 0.8, Er = 22.32). The case for 2 R / L x = 0.4, Er = 18.10 forms an exception in that the particle moves very slightly away from the centre into a stable off-centre position, while in the other cases the particle remains at the centre of the duct, which can be also understood with the migration to the previously observed weak attractor region at similar Ericksen numbers 33 (see Table 2 for conversion of Ericksen numbers). A noticeable difference is that with increasing confinement the defect ring appears compressed in the smallest duct dimension due to the relative proximity of the walls (see image and Movie S2 (ESI†) for 2 R / L x = 0.8, Er = 22.32).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations