2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13234805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controllably Deep Supervision and Multi-Scale Feature Fusion Network for Cloud and Snow Detection Based on Medium- and High-Resolution Imagery Dataset

Abstract: Clouds and snow in remote sensing imageries cover underlying surface information, reducing image availability. Moreover, they interact with each other, decreasing the cloud and snow detection accuracy. In this study, we propose a convolutional neural network for cloud and snow detection, named the cloud and snow detection network (CSD-Net). It incorporates the multi-scale feature fusion module (MFF) and the controllably deep supervision and feature fusion structure (CDSFF). MFF can capture and aggregate featur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we illustrate the performance of the proposed UCTNet on the previously stated snow/cloud dataset. As shown in Table 2, a variety of methods are used for the performance comparison, including commonly used segmentation methods and the specially designed snow and cloud detection method (i.e., CSD-Net [35]). Segmentation methods could be categorized into CNN-based methods (i.e., U-Net [36] and DeepLab-V3 [37]) and recently proposed Transformer-based networks (i.e., ResT-Tiny [38] and Swin-Tiny [27]).…”
Section: Quantitative and Qualitative Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we illustrate the performance of the proposed UCTNet on the previously stated snow/cloud dataset. As shown in Table 2, a variety of methods are used for the performance comparison, including commonly used segmentation methods and the specially designed snow and cloud detection method (i.e., CSD-Net [35]). Segmentation methods could be categorized into CNN-based methods (i.e., U-Net [36] and DeepLab-V3 [37]) and recently proposed Transformer-based networks (i.e., ResT-Tiny [38] and Swin-Tiny [27]).…”
Section: Quantitative and Qualitative Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 shows the values of various indicators of different models on our dataset. In order to fully prove the advantages of our model in identifying clouds and cloud shadows, in addition to the classical semantic segmentation model, we select different models in the past five years as a comparison, among which we also select four latest networks for cloud detection: SP_CSANet, 43 CSDNet, 45 PADANet, 41 and GAFRNet 42 . It can be seen from this table that whether it is the semantic segmentation network or the network model dedicated to cloud detection, the proposed model has the highest accuracy in all indicators, at least 1.949% higher than the other networks on MIOU.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MFF can obtain low-level features with different fine-grained and high-level features with different sizes to ensure that the highlevel semantic features of cloud and snow extracted are more distinct. CDSFF can provide a depth-supervised mechanism with adjustable losses and combine information from neighbouring layers to obtain more representative features [43] .…”
Section: Encoder Decoder Structurementioning
confidence: 99%