2016
DOI: 10.2174/1389201017666160127110440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlled Drug Delivery Using Microdevices

Abstract: Therapeutic drugs administered systematically are evenly distributed to the whole body through blood circulation and have to cross many biological barriers before reaching the pathological site. Conventional drug delivery may make drugs inactive or reduce their potency as they may be hydrolyzed or degraded enzymatically and are rapidly excreted through the urinary system resulting in suboptimal concentration of drugs at the desired site. Controlled drug delivery aims to localize the pharmacological activity of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
28
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…While these advantages can be significant, the possible disadvantages cannot be ignored, such as non-biocompatibility or toxicity of the materials used and undesirable by-products of degradation [4]. Controlled release supported by biodegradable and biocompatible nanotechnology-based carriers can possibly improve the therapeutic efficacy of drugs, minimize their systemic adverse effects, and increase patients' adherence to the regimen through decreasing the administration frequency and dose [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these advantages can be significant, the possible disadvantages cannot be ignored, such as non-biocompatibility or toxicity of the materials used and undesirable by-products of degradation [4]. Controlled release supported by biodegradable and biocompatible nanotechnology-based carriers can possibly improve the therapeutic efficacy of drugs, minimize their systemic adverse effects, and increase patients' adherence to the regimen through decreasing the administration frequency and dose [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It possesses several features including low-cost, simple and fast analysis, low reagent consumption, high capillary electrophoresis separation efficiency, precise control over the fluid behavior, and high efficiency and sensitivity because of its high surface to volume ratio and micro liter volume of micro channel. These devices with inherent miniaturization, integration, and automation can analyze complex biological fluids for healthcare applications [13,14]. Different varieties of microfluidic platforms have been used for the detection of disease biomarkers including silicon and glass, polymers, paper, and hybrid devices.…”
Section: Microfluidic Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With various advantages including low sample/reagent consumption, integration, miniaturization and automation, the microfluidic lab-on-a-chip provides a platform for a variety of human health diagnostics with high efficiency (Dou et al 2016a; Dou et al 2016b; Dou et al 2015; Fu et al 2016; Li et al 2011; Li et al 2012; Li and Zhou 2013; Liu et al 2011; Sanjay et al 2016a; Sanjay et al 2015; Shen et al 2014; Tian et al 2016; Zhang et al 2014), as well as the possibility for multiplexed detection (Fang et al 2012; Zuo et al 2013). By taking advantage of different substrates, we previously developed a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)/paper hybrid microfluidic device integrated with aptamer-functionalized graphene oxide nanosensors for one-step detection of multiple foodborne pathogens simultaneously (Zuo et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%