2010
DOI: 10.1557/proc-1253-k08-04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlled Fabrication of Nanostructure Material Based Chemical Sensors

Abstract: In this paper, we report on a processing approach for a microsensor platform that incorporates nanorods in a controlled, efficient, and effective manner. Using this novel approach of combining dielectrophoresis with standard microfabrication processing and materials, we have achieved reproducible, time-efficient fabrication of gas sensors with buried contacts to the tin oxide (SnO 2 ) nanorods used for the detection of gases. The steps associated with this approach are described in detail. Semiconducting SnO 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The iron catalyst is removed from the MWCNTs by subsequent annealing at 1,7008C. This post-treatment also removes defects in the sidewalls of the tubes (Evans et al, 2010;Andrews et al, 1999). With loose surface carbon removed or returned to the ideal tube structure, the Figure 1 Dispersed MWCNT deposited on an interdigitated finger sensor structure (finger spacing , 10 mm) examined at lower and higher magnification (left and right hand side, respectively) Note: Notice the random, uncontrolled nature of the resulting deposition Source: Hunter et al (2006) MWCNTs have more uniform and reproducible exposed carbon planes and edges.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iron catalyst is removed from the MWCNTs by subsequent annealing at 1,7008C. This post-treatment also removes defects in the sidewalls of the tubes (Evans et al, 2010;Andrews et al, 1999). With loose surface carbon removed or returned to the ideal tube structure, the Figure 1 Dispersed MWCNT deposited on an interdigitated finger sensor structure (finger spacing , 10 mm) examined at lower and higher magnification (left and right hand side, respectively) Note: Notice the random, uncontrolled nature of the resulting deposition Source: Hunter et al (2006) MWCNTs have more uniform and reproducible exposed carbon planes and edges.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%