“…In the past few years, biobased polymers extracted from benign organic wastes are becoming a feasible alternative to produce CRFs as they could be easily degraded by native soil microorganisms. − ,− Specifically, fertilizer delivery systems based on biobased polymers might result in significant advantages over their fossil fuel-based counterparts: good biocompatibility and affinity for biomolecules present in the agricultural soil, biodegradability, lower costs, high water retention capacity, improvement in soil permeability, and enhanced NUE into the natural soil matrix. ,, Cost–benefits analysis for biobased polymer CRFs is weighted in the significant increase in crop production. − For instance, Zhang et al found that the cost of poly(acrylic acid)-coated lignin–clay nanohybrid CRF was reduced 74–75% as compared to urea-formaldehyde fertilizer and increased by only 16–18% compared to bare urea. Likewise, Tang et al reported that the production cost of a CRF coated with sodium alginate is up to five times higher than bare urea, yet only twice as compared to a commercial CRF urea fertilizer coated with a synthetic polymer (i. e., Kingenta ).…”