Controlling a 33 kV Flexible Power Link in GB's distribution network

Jupe, Samuel; Hoda, S.; King, James E.; Dale, D.A.; Berry, Jonathan

doi:10.1049/cp.2019.0021

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, if the transformer-less UPFC is deactivated (i.e. V se = 0), the uncompensated active and reactive power P 2 ′ and Q 2 ′ are given, as in (4).…”

Section: Transformer-less Upfc In An MV Distribution Networkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…An acknowledged trend is to transfer the Flexible AC Transmission Systems (FACTs) technology to MV network applications [1,2]. This is reflected by the commissioning of several projects which use power electronics in MV distribution networks, such as Angle-DC project ± 27 kV, 30.5 MVA [3], Flexible Power Link project 33 kV, 20 MVA [4] and Active Response project 11 kV, 5 MVA [5]. These projects aim to control the power flow (e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Transformer‐less unified power flow controller in medium voltage distribution networks

Abdelrahman

Wang

Ming

et al. 2023

IET Generation Trans & Dist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A transformer‐less unified power flow controller (UPFC) is a power electronic device consisting of series and shunt voltage source converters (VSCs) that are not connected to a common DC bus. It can control power flow in medium voltage (MV) distribution networks without the need for interfacing transformers. Hence there is a significant reduction in size and cost compared to a conventional UPFC. This paper investigates the operating range of a transformer‐less UPFC in an MV distribution network and the required power ratings of the series and shunt converters. The results showed that a transformer‐less UPFC is able to provide active power control using partially rated converters. However, its ability to control reactive power is limited by the current ratings of the converters. The analysis was verified using software simulation and hardware experiment.

show abstract

“…However, if the transformer-less UPFC is deactivated (i.e. V se = 0), the uncompensated active and reactive power P 2 ′ and Q 2 ′ are given, as in (4).…”

Section: Transformer-less Upfc In An MV Distribution Networkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transformer‐less unified power flow controller in medium voltage distribution networks

Abdelrahman

Wang

Ming

et al. 2023

IET Generation Trans & Dist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…FPLak bi norabideetan potentzia transmititzeko gai dira, eta aldi berean potentzia erreaktiboaren kontsumoa edo sorkuntza erregulatu dezakete [6]. Gainera, maiztasun, fase edo tentsio-anplitude ezberdinetako sareko bi puntu lotzeko aukera eskaintzen dute.…”

Section: Sare Adimendunaunclassified

FPL potentzia-bihurgailuen analisia akats elektrikoen zehar

Davila,

Planas,

Cortajarena

et al. 2023

EKAIA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Banaketa-sarea hainbat erronkari aurre egiten ari da, hala nola kontsumo elektrikoaren hazkundeari, baliabide berriztagarrien integrazioari eta abarri, eta horiek gaur egungo banaketa-sarea, sare adimenduagoetara bideratzen ari dira. Sare adimendu horietan, ezinbestekoa da potentzia-elektronika erabiltzea beharrezko funtzionalitate berriak gehitzeko, hala nola akats elektrikoak arintzeko. Alde horretatik, akats elektrikoak arintzean tentsio desorekatuak sortzen dira eta potentzia-bihurgailuak erabili daitezke tentsioak orekatzeko. Goi-tentsioko lineen kasuan, \textit{Flexible Power Links} (FPL) aukera egokia da, energia fluxua bi norabideetan kontrolatzeko gai izateaz gain, tentsio desorekatuak sor baititzake. Artikulu honek FPL potentzia-bihurgailuetan erabiltzen diren topologia nagusiak aztertzen ditu eta haien portaera aztertzen du akats monofasikoak arintzean. Simulazioaren emaitzak aztertu dira topologia bakoitzaren abantailak eta desabantailak lortuz.

show abstract