2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c09570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling Degradation and Erosion of Polymer Networks: Insights from Mesoscale Modeling

Abstract: Understanding and controlling degradation of polymer networks on the mesoscale is critical for a range of applications. We utilize dissipative particle dynamics to capture photocontrolled degradation and erosion processes in hydrogels formed by end-linking of four-arm polyethylene glycol precursors. We demonstrate that the polydispersity and the fraction of brokenoff fragments scale with the relative extent of reaction. The reverse gel point measured is close to the value predicted by the bond percolation theo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To characterize the degradation process, we first define a cluster as a set of bonded precursors at any stage during the degradation. 49 In a similar manner, we define the nanogel as the largest cluster of bonded precursors at a given time instant. This definition is relevant until the reverse gel point since only until this point, the largest cluster represents the remnant part of the original nanogel, as can be seen in Figure S1.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To characterize the degradation process, we first define a cluster as a set of bonded precursors at any stage during the degradation. 49 In a similar manner, we define the nanogel as the largest cluster of bonded precursors at a given time instant. This definition is relevant until the reverse gel point since only until this point, the largest cluster represents the remnant part of the original nanogel, as can be seen in Figure S1.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the bonded beads, an additional force is introduced in eq corresponding to the harmonic potential, U normalb normalo normaln normald = K normalb 2 ( r i j r b ) 2 , where we set K b = 10 3 as a spring constant and r b = 0.7 as an equilibrium bond distance. To prevent unphysical crossing of polymer chains, we also adopted mSRP DPD formulation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters defining mSRP interactions are set as [101] b = 80 and d c = 0.8. These mSRP parameters were shown to effectively minimize topology violations in the original publication [101] and in the subsequent studies [105]. For the repulsion parameter between the same type of beads, we choose a ii = 78 in reduced DPD units, this value is calculated to reproduce water compressibility and corresponds to a single bead representing three water molecules [99].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the mSRP formulation, an additional repulsive force F ij SRP = b (1 – d ij / d c ) e ij S is applied between the centers of the bonds if the distance between these centers, d ij = | d ij |, is below the cutoff distance d c ; herein, e ij S = d ij / d ij . Then, K b = 500, r b = 0.7, and mSRP parameters as b = 80 and d c = 0.8; these mSRP parameters were previously shown to effectively reduce topology violations. , Remaining parameters are chosen as follows: the beads number density is ρ = 3, the mass is m = 1, the cutoff radius is r c = 1, and the strengths of the dissipative and random forces are chosen to satisfy fluctuation-dissipation theorem , as γ = 4.5 and σ = 3.0. The parameters above and all of the simulation values below are provided in reduced DPD units.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, K b = 500, r b = 0.7, and mSRP parameters as b = 80 and d c = 0.8; these mSRP parameters were previously shown to effectively reduce topology violations. 42,43 Remaining parameters are chosen as follows: 32 the beads number density is ρ = 3, the mass is m = 1, the cutoff radius is r c = 1, and the strengths of the dissipative and random forces are chosen to satisfy fluctuation-dissipation theorem 32,34 as γ = 4.5 and σ = 3.0. The parameters above and all of the simulation values below are provided in reduced DPD units.…”
Section: Xf-np/pfoa Distribution Analysis Viamentioning
confidence: 99%