2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2009.5198855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling Error Propagation in Network-Coded Cooperative Wireless Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these studies have the main objective to analyze the effectiveness of such a joint decoding design for the robust and reliable operation of network-coded wireless architectures over lossy networks and to overcome some initial assumptions retained in, e.g., [15]. For example, in [15] ideal errorcorrecting codes are assumed for the source-to-relay channels, which results in having error-free communication over these links, as well as in introducing a diversity loss since the local channel code blocks the whole frame if just a single bit is erroneous (see, e.g., [36], [37]). Some examples of recent research results addressing the exploitation and the benefits of a joint network-channel code design and decoding can be found in [38]- [48].…”
Section: Recent Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies have the main objective to analyze the effectiveness of such a joint decoding design for the robust and reliable operation of network-coded wireless architectures over lossy networks and to overcome some initial assumptions retained in, e.g., [15]. For example, in [15] ideal errorcorrecting codes are assumed for the source-to-relay channels, which results in having error-free communication over these links, as well as in introducing a diversity loss since the local channel code blocks the whole frame if just a single bit is erroneous (see, e.g., [36], [37]). Some examples of recent research results addressing the exploitation and the benefits of a joint network-channel code design and decoding can be found in [38]- [48].…”
Section: Recent Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies linked to joint network-channel decoding have been proposed in [24] and [25]. These studies have focused on relaxing some of the hypotheses introduced in [25], like assuming that the error correction is perfect between the source and the relays, see for example [5], [56], or [3]. Other results on joint network-channel decoding and more specifically code optimization can be found in [61].…”
Section: Recent Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the strategy employed for mitigating error propagation is a bit more complicated compared with that in the case of unidirectional relaying, particularly when, for this purpose, the maximum‐likelihood (ML) detection scheme is employed at the destination, which requires that the instantaneous CSI of both source–relay links is available at the destination. In [29, 30], for the case of the TDBC protocol, two LLR‐based selective relaying schemes have been presented. In the first scheme, the relay compares the LLR values of the two bits received from the source nodes with two predetermined thresholds to decide whether to transmit in the broadcast phase or not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%