2012
DOI: 10.1088/0256-307x/29/8/080303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling Excitation Inversion of a Cooper Pair Box Interacting with a Nanomechanical Resonator

Abstract: Abstract. We investigate the action of time dependent detunings upon the excitation inversion of a Cooper pair box interacting with a nanomechanical resonator. The method employs the Jaynes-Cummings model with damping, assuming different decay rates of the Cooper pair box and various fixed and t-dependent detunings. It is shown that while the presence of damping plus constant detunings destroy the collapse/revival effects, convenient choices of time dependent detunings allow one to reconstruct such events in a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…and χ(t) = χ 0 +εf (t) [23,24]. In addition we consider the presence of the term κ(t) standing for the time-dependent loss affecting the CPB, the term δ(t) being the same for the NR, and χ(t) is the response time of the Kerr medium.…”
Section: The Hamiltonian Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and χ(t) = χ 0 +εf (t) [23,24]. In addition we consider the presence of the term κ(t) standing for the time-dependent loss affecting the CPB, the term δ(t) being the same for the NR, and χ(t) is the response time of the Kerr medium.…”
Section: The Hamiltonian Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent interest in the study of the cavity quantum electrodynamics type systems such as a superconducting qubit can open new ways for studying the interaction between light and solid-state quantum devices [3,4]. Various theoretical and experimental works have discussed the interaction between superconducting qubits with either quantized [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] or classical fields [20][21][22]. In references [5,6] the model proposed including these ingredients and using some adequate approximations which allow for the linearization of the interaction and nonclassical states of the field are generated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent interest in the study of the cavity quantum electrodynamics type systems such as a superconducting qubit can open new ways for studying the interaction between light and solid-state quantum devices. 3,4 Various theoretical and experimental works have discussed the interaction between superconducting qubits with either quantized [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] or classical fields. [20][21][22] Recently, it has been proposed a way to project quantum states using a superconducting quantum device (SQUID) charge qubit inside a cavity 5,6 with a controllable interaction between the cavity field and the charge qubit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%