2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-020-03221-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling interfacial interactions in LDPE/flax fibre biocomposites by a combined chemical and radiation-induced grafting approach

Abstract: in materials applications make natural fibres promising alternative reinforcements for composite applications (Müssig 2010;Yan et al. 2014;Bourmaud et al. 2018). Natural fibres have several advantages compared to synthetic fibres such as glass, in particular their biobased and renewable origin and biodegradability, low cost, low density, low abrasiveness and their excellent damping and specific mechanical

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the interaction between particles and matrix, rod-shaped particles have the best reinforcement effect, followed by spheres and flakes. The particle shape often impacts the fluidity of the polymer chain, ultimately affecting the melting [88][89][90] coefficient and internal stress. The particles can be classified as nanoparticles and microparticles based on their size.…”
Section: Inorganic Particle Additivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the interaction between particles and matrix, rod-shaped particles have the best reinforcement effect, followed by spheres and flakes. The particle shape often impacts the fluidity of the polymer chain, ultimately affecting the melting [88][89][90] coefficient and internal stress. The particles can be classified as nanoparticles and microparticles based on their size.…”
Section: Inorganic Particle Additivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to improve the mechanical properties, and widen the application of 3D printing in composite materials, it is essential to improve the interfacial performance of 3D-printed composites. 19 Currently, to improve the interfacial performance of composites, the common modification methods includes the introduction of active groups onto the surface of the fiber, like oxidation, [20][21][22] plasma, [23][24][25] and radiation 26,27 ; another method is to introduce interfacial phase, like coupling agents, 28,29 nano-coating, [30][31][32][33] and polymer-coating. [34][35][36] Tian et al 37 oxidized carbon fiber with concentrated nitric acid and prepared a carbon fiber-reinforced polypropylene composite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, to improve the interfacial performance of composites, the common modification methods includes the introduction of active groups onto the surface of the fiber, like oxidation, 20–22 plasma, 23–25 and radiation 26,27 ; another method is to introduce interfacial phase, like coupling agents, 28,29 nano‐coating, 30–33 and polymer‐coating 34–36 . Tian et al 37 oxidized carbon fiber with concentrated nitric acid and prepared a carbon fiber‐reinforced polypropylene composite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%