2015
DOI: 10.2217/nnm.14.204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling Ligand Density on Nanoparticles as a Means to Enhance Biological Activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…29 We posit that the difference in particle size and antibody loading density between N1-34a-NPs and our previous NP formulation is responsible for the disparity in obtaining preferential and specific binding to MDA-MB-231 TNBC cells. This would be in agreement with prior studies that show cellular binding of NPs is significantly impacted by the size and shape of the NP [30][31][32][33] and by the density of the targeting moiety presented on the surface of the NP. 32,33 Future studies are needed to define the optimal size of the particles and density of Notch1 antibodies on these NPs to maximize TNBC cell-specific binding and potentially increase downstream Notch signaling inhibition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…29 We posit that the difference in particle size and antibody loading density between N1-34a-NPs and our previous NP formulation is responsible for the disparity in obtaining preferential and specific binding to MDA-MB-231 TNBC cells. This would be in agreement with prior studies that show cellular binding of NPs is significantly impacted by the size and shape of the NP [30][31][32][33] and by the density of the targeting moiety presented on the surface of the NP. 32,33 Future studies are needed to define the optimal size of the particles and density of Notch1 antibodies on these NPs to maximize TNBC cell-specific binding and potentially increase downstream Notch signaling inhibition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This would be in agreement with prior studies that show cellular binding of NPs is significantly impacted by the size and shape of the NP [30][31][32][33] and by the density of the targeting moiety presented on the surface of the NP. 32,33 Future studies are needed to define the optimal size of the particles and density of Notch1 antibodies on these NPs to maximize TNBC cell-specific binding and potentially increase downstream Notch signaling inhibition. While N1-34a-NPs did not display enhanced binding to TNBC cells in this work relative to IgG-functionalized NPs, we did find that Notch1 antibody functionalization was critical for eliciting significant therapeutic effect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Uses for NPs as carrier systems for chemotherapeutic drugs are gaining attention due to the specificity of NPs for cancer cells, enhanced efficiency, and reduced systemic toxicity (Lee and Odom, 2015). AuNPs have several advantages, including a bio-compatible core, which makes them an ideal starting point for a nano-carrier system (Jain et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density of targeting ligands can be adjusted to minimize their impact on the nanomedicine's blood circulation and tumor accumulation while increasing cellular uptake . Shielding the targeting/functional groups during blood circulation but exposing them once in tumors is the prevailing approach to this dilemma.…”
Section: Approaches To Achieve the 3s Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%