2008
DOI: 10.1242/dev.001115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling morpholino experiments: don't stop making antisense

Abstract: One of the most significant problems facing developmental biologists who do not work on an organism with welldeveloped genetics -and even for some who do -is how to inhibit the action of a gene of interest during development so as to learn about its normal biological function. A widely adopted approach is to use antisense technologies, and especially morpholino antisense oligonucleotides. In this article, we review the use of such reagents and present examples of how they have provided insights into developmen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
498
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 560 publications
(512 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
11
498
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This study allowed us to define the loss of function properties of one DEPDC5 missense mutation alongside one nonsense mutation found in epileptic patients in vivo. Furthermore, in this report, we have performed all the necessary controls to validate the phenotype derived by knockdown through antisense morpholino oligonucleotides, including the use of both splice and ATG‐blocking oligonucleotides, phenotypic rescue by the WT human cDNA, and injection of mismatch‐oligo controls 32, 33…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study allowed us to define the loss of function properties of one DEPDC5 missense mutation alongside one nonsense mutation found in epileptic patients in vivo. Furthermore, in this report, we have performed all the necessary controls to validate the phenotype derived by knockdown through antisense morpholino oligonucleotides, including the use of both splice and ATG‐blocking oligonucleotides, phenotypic rescue by the WT human cDNA, and injection of mismatch‐oligo controls 32, 33…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mos (Gene Tools, LLC) were designed and injected into fertilized one-cell embryos, as detailed in Table S1. The specificity and inhibitory efficiency of each Mo were determined as described (14). Optimal Mo concentrations (Tables S1 and S2) were determined on the basis of morphological criteria.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xenopus laevis is the standard model, but is allotetraploid and hence less suited for genetic approaches than the diploid Xenopus tropicalis, whose genome sequence has been determined (2). Whereas embryological manipulations and gainof-function experiments are major strengths of Xenopus, reverse genetics is currently limited to the use of antisense reagents that provide transient and often incomplete gene knockdown (3). The ability to introduce targeted, heritable mutations that disrupt gene function has remained elusive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%