2011
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6750-11-25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling pH in shake flasks using polymer-based controlled-release discs with pre-determined release kinetics

Abstract: BackgroundThere are significant differences in the culture conditions between small-scale screenings and large-scale fermentation processes. Production processes are usually conducted in fed-batch cultivation mode with active pH-monitoring and control. In contrast, screening experiments in shake flasks are usually conducted in batch mode without active pH-control, but with high buffer concentrations to prevent excessive pH-drifts. These differences make it difficult to compare results from screening experiment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pH range for growth was also determined by assessing changes in the OD 600 in MB adjusted to pH 5.0-10.0 (in increments of 0.5 pH units), incubated at 35 u C for 7 days. The following buffers were used for pH experiments: citrate/phosphate (pH 5.0 and 5.5), MOPS (Sigma) (pH 6.0-8.0), boric acid/borax (pH 8.5 and 9.0), carbonate/bicarbonate (pH 9.5 and 10.0), borax/NaOH (pH 9.5 and 10.0) and Tris/HCl (pH 8.5-10.0), each at a final concentration of 50 mM (Scheidle et al, 2011;Jang et al, 2013). The pH of a subsample of autoclave-sterilized medium was measured before inoculation of cells to check for changes in pH.…”
Section: G Tropica Cl-cb462mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pH range for growth was also determined by assessing changes in the OD 600 in MB adjusted to pH 5.0-10.0 (in increments of 0.5 pH units), incubated at 35 u C for 7 days. The following buffers were used for pH experiments: citrate/phosphate (pH 5.0 and 5.5), MOPS (Sigma) (pH 6.0-8.0), boric acid/borax (pH 8.5 and 9.0), carbonate/bicarbonate (pH 9.5 and 10.0), borax/NaOH (pH 9.5 and 10.0) and Tris/HCl (pH 8.5-10.0), each at a final concentration of 50 mM (Scheidle et al, 2011;Jang et al, 2013). The pH of a subsample of autoclave-sterilized medium was measured before inoculation of cells to check for changes in pH.…”
Section: G Tropica Cl-cb462mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small amount of the purified colony was inoculated in 50 ml King A liquid medium for 3 days on a rotary shaker at 150 r.p.m., 28 u C, to determine the optimum temperature for growth by measuring OD 600 using a spectrometric method (Optizen 2120UV; Mechasis). The pH range (pH 5.0-10.0, intervals of 0.5 pH units) for growth was determined by assessing changes in OD 600 over the incubation period (up to 7 days) in King A broth at 28 u C. Prior to autoclaving, the pH of the medium was adjusted using appropriate biological buffers: citrate/phosphate (pH 5.0 and 5.5), MOPS (Sigma) (pH 6.0-8.0), boric acid/borax (pH 8.5 and 9.0), borax/ NaOH (pH 9.5 and 10.0) and Tris/HCl (pH 8.5-10.0), each at a final concentration of 50 mM (Scheidle et al, 2011). After autoclaving and cooling, the pH of subsamples of each medium was measured, before inoculation with cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was used for different applications in process development, media optimization and screening of microorganisms (Stö ckmann et al, 2003;Jeude et al, 2006;Klement et al, 2011). Several publications characterized the growth of the model microorganism E. coli in RAMOS shake flask cultures (Losen et al, 2004;Scheidle et al, 2007;Huber et al, 2011;Scheidle et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%