2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling phytoplankton blooms in a canyon-shaped drinking water reservoir via artificial and induced natural mixing: Taxonomic versus functional groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…was suitable for growth in the mixed layer of et al, 2002), particularly those with a high surface-to-volume ratio and weak light adaptation, such as functional group D. Furthermore, non-motile Bacillariophyta and Chlorophyta can remain in the euphotic layer for longer periods and receive light for photosynthesis, thanks to the carrying effect produced by vertical mixing (Li et al, 2019). The study confirmed this finding and was consistent with other studies (Wen et al, 2022). The results also demonstrate a decrease in Z eu /Z mix (light availability) in 2020, while there was an occasional increase in phytoplankton abundance, suggesting that light limitation was not a critical factor influencing the changes in phytoplankton, especially for non-motile algae.…”
Section: Key Drivers Affecting Phytoplankton Functional Groups During...supporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…was suitable for growth in the mixed layer of et al, 2002), particularly those with a high surface-to-volume ratio and weak light adaptation, such as functional group D. Furthermore, non-motile Bacillariophyta and Chlorophyta can remain in the euphotic layer for longer periods and receive light for photosynthesis, thanks to the carrying effect produced by vertical mixing (Li et al, 2019). The study confirmed this finding and was consistent with other studies (Wen et al, 2022). The results also demonstrate a decrease in Z eu /Z mix (light availability) in 2020, while there was an occasional increase in phytoplankton abundance, suggesting that light limitation was not a critical factor influencing the changes in phytoplankton, especially for non-motile algae.…”
Section: Key Drivers Affecting Phytoplankton Functional Groups During...supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Besides, the ecological condition of the water column during the mixing period was better than that of the stratification period. Similar observations have been reported for other studies (Dembowska et al, 2015;Wen et al, 2022). Therefore, it is crucial to extend the mixing period to enhance the ecological status of the reservoir.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Ecological Statesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The vertical distribution of phytoplankton is fundamental to the dynamics and structure of aquatic communities (Ryabov et al, 2010). Increased mixing has been identified as a key strategy to mitigate algal blooms (Visser et al, 2016;Wen et al, 2022), and increasing mixing promotes uniformity in the vertical distribution of phytoplankton communities across different layers in terms of density, biomass, and compositional structure. This uniformity in the vertical distribution of phytoplankton has emerged as a reliable indicator of the effectiveness of water quality regulation under hydrodynamic conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%