We present a synthetic adaptation of the fibrillar adhesion surfaces found in nature. The structure consists of protruding fibrils topped by a thin plate and shows an experimentally measured enhancement in adhesion energy of up to a factor of 9 over a flat control. Additionally, this structure solves the robustness problems of previous mimic structures and has preferred contact properties (i.e., a large surface area and a highly compliant structure). We show that this geometry enhances adhesion because of its ability to trap interfacial cracks in highly compliant contact regimes between successive fibril detachments. This results in the requirement that the externally supplied energy release rate for interfacial separation be greater than the intrinsic work of adhesion, in a manner analogous to lattice trapping of cracks in crystalline solids.interface ͉ fracture ͉ fibrillar ͉ lattice trapping ͉ biomechanics T he ability to adhere two surfaces strongly together and then reversibly separate them, repeatedly, is a desirable capability that is rarely achievable using conventional fabrication techniques and materials. Nevertheless, fibrillar surfaces with these properties have evolved in nature on the adhesive surfaces of the feet of many lizards and insects. With such natural surfaces as inspiration, we have developed a fibrillar structure that produces a robust, reusable material with strongly enhanced adhesion compared with a flat control of the same material, with the enhancement resulting only from the modification of surface geometry.The essential feature that our surfaces borrow from biology is the seta, a hair-like bristle having a diameter of 0.5-10 m and terminating in one or more flattened, expanded tips (''spatulas'') at its contacting end. A number of biological studies (1-16) have found that arrays of setae are a common feature on the adhesion surfaces of many lizards and insects. In the biological literature, the shape, dimensions, and composition of setae from various species are described (1-5, 9-16). Also, the mechanical properties and adhesion force of a single gecko seta (7) and even a single spatula (17,18) were the subjects of recent investigations. An important conclusion to emerge from these two studies is that setal arrays use noncovalent surface forces to achieve adhesion, and evidence suggests that geckos rely primarily on van der Waals and capillary forces (8, 18). As a result, the surface architecture is the primary design variable that has been adjusted in biological systems by evolution.Because of the extraordinary adhesion ability of animals that possess setal arrays, several researchers have recently made an effort to mimic the biological setal geometry by using synthetic materials (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26). It has been established theoretically that a fibrillar interface can increase both strength and interfacial toughness, compared with a flat control (21, 27-30). However, simple arrays of micropillars (19-21) have not exhibited stronger adhesion than flat control surfaces o...