2014
DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.114.001815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling Radiation Exposure in Interventional Cardiology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For diagnostic catheterization, median total X-ray dose was 625 vs 798 mGy (p<0.001) and for percutaneous coronary intervention 1675 vs 2463 mGy (p<0.001). Similar to our study and to the study by Pyne et al ,14 fluoroscopy times were not influenced by the change in pulsed frame rate 20…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For diagnostic catheterization, median total X-ray dose was 625 vs 798 mGy (p<0.001) and for percutaneous coronary intervention 1675 vs 2463 mGy (p<0.001). Similar to our study and to the study by Pyne et al ,14 fluoroscopy times were not influenced by the change in pulsed frame rate 20…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although they are not exposed to the direct X-ray beam, invasive cardiologists receive radiation from the scatter, which can vary extremely, ranging from 0.04 to 38 μSv per procedure ( 25 ). Over the course of an interventional cardiologist's career, he or she is exposed to 50–200 mSv of ionizing radiation, which is equivalent to 2,500–10,000 chest X-rays ( 9 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 26 ). Newer techniques focus on minimizing, or even eliminating radiation use but these protocols are not widespread ( 27 , 28 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physicians at academic institutions and fellows-in-training endure more radiation than their experienced, non-teaching counterparts, which should be considered when interpreting this data. Further study is merited to account for these intrinsic shortcomings ( 14 ).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lowest achievable pulse rate while still preserving acceptable imaging quality has not been identified. To date, fluoroscopy pulse rates in the United States typically vary between 15 and 30 pulses/sec (p/s) . The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the extent to which patient dose was reduced when fluoroscopy pulse rates were reduced from 10 to 7.5 p/s in patients undergoing diagnostic angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%