2020
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.102.053316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling the ac Stark effect of RbCs with dc electric and magnetic fields

Abstract: We investigate the effects of static electric and magnetic fields on the differential ac Stark shifts for microwave transitions in ultracold bosonic 87 Rb 133 Cs molecules, for light of wavelength λ = 1064 nm. Near this wavelength we observe unexpected two-photon transitions that may cause trap loss. We measure the ac Stark effect in external magnetic and electric fields, using microwave spectroscopy of the first rotational transition. We quantify the isotropic and anisotropic parts of the molecular polarizabi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
(176 reference statements)
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a quantum memory to be effective, long-lived coherence is required. These states are well suited for this, as molecules stored in these states experience the same polarisability, leading to the possibility of long coherence times in optical traps 60,79,80 . In contrast, for qubits constructed from two different rotational states, differential ac Stark shifts arising from the anisotropy of the polarisability are typically the primary cause of decoherence for optically trapped molecules [81][82][83] .…”
Section: Raman Transitions In a 3-level Lambda Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a quantum memory to be effective, long-lived coherence is required. These states are well suited for this, as molecules stored in these states experience the same polarisability, leading to the possibility of long coherence times in optical traps 60,79,80 . In contrast, for qubits constructed from two different rotational states, differential ac Stark shifts arising from the anisotropy of the polarisability are typically the primary cause of decoherence for optically trapped molecules [81][82][83] .…”
Section: Raman Transitions In a 3-level Lambda Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sequence of microwave transfer and trap recapture is then repeated until the molecules occupy the desired rotational state. For each recapture, we tune the intensity of the trap to maintain the same trap parameters, compensating for the difference in polarisability between the different rotational states 79,80 . For a typical transfer, the dipole trap is switched off for < 500 µs, which is short enough that we do not observe significant molecule losses associated with the switching; the trap frequencies in the trap are (ω x , ω y , ω z )/(2π) = (28, 113, 111) Hz.…”
Section: Exploration Of Higher Rotational Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To begin, we seek to identify pairs of nuclear spin states with identical magnetic moments that connect to a common excited rotational state, by calculating the rotational and hyperfine structure of the RbCs molecule in externally applied magnetic and optical fields [1,2,6,31]. We construct the Hamiltonian (see Methods) in a fully uncoupled basis set |N, M N |i Rb , m Rb |i Cs , m Cs , where N represents the angular momentum of the molecule with its projection along the quantisation axis M N , and i Rb = 3/2, i Cs = 7/2 denote the nuclear spins of Rb and Cs respectively, with their projections m Rb , m Cs .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The environment of the molecule can induce decoherence from sources such as fluctuating electric fields, magnetic fields, and inhomogeneous differential light shifts from the optical tweezer light [31,32]. To date, all previous studies of molecular coherence times have been done in a bulk gas or lat-tices [33][34][35][36][37][38]. In those works, the coherence times were limited below 10 ms by inhomogeneous broadening from the trapping light or density dependent dipolar scattering.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%