2021
DOI: 10.1039/d1sm00103e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling the chirality and number of strands of helices self-assembled from achiral block copolymers confined inside a nanopore: a simulation study

Abstract: Achiral block copolymers can self-assemble into helical structures when confined within a cylindrical nanopore. Controlling the chirality and number of strands of helices, however, is challenging. We present our simulation...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[169,171,175,176] The reason can be ascribed to the fact that there was no free energy difference between these two chiral structures, unless a chiral potential field was deliberately applied. [171,174,[177][178][179][180] The exploration on confined assembly of BCPs* and understanding on it lag far behind than the ones on the selfassembly of BCPs* in bulk/films and selective solutions, given the sophistication of BCP* assembly behavior and confining effects. Although there has not been a systematic investigation on the 1D confined assembly of BCPs* yet, it is sensible to expect that a low D value would impact the integrity and thread of the helix* domains.…”
Section: Self-assembly Of Bcps* Under Confinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[169,171,175,176] The reason can be ascribed to the fact that there was no free energy difference between these two chiral structures, unless a chiral potential field was deliberately applied. [171,174,[177][178][179][180] The exploration on confined assembly of BCPs* and understanding on it lag far behind than the ones on the selfassembly of BCPs* in bulk/films and selective solutions, given the sophistication of BCP* assembly behavior and confining effects. Although there has not been a systematic investigation on the 1D confined assembly of BCPs* yet, it is sensible to expect that a low D value would impact the integrity and thread of the helix* domains.…”
Section: Self-assembly Of Bcps* Under Confinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35] Complementary to adding the chemical components or changing the topologies, [36][37][38][39] introducing geometric confinement is an alternative way to fabricate novel nanostructures. [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] Russell and coworkers reported the formation of cylindrical and concentric lamellar structures by the self-assemble of asymmetric and symmetric polystyrene-b-polybutadiene (PS-b-PBD) diblock copolymers confined to cylindrical alumina nanopores. [51] This concentric lamellar structures were also identified in the cylindrical confinement of symmetric polystyrene-b-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PS-b-PMMA) diblock copolymers, [52] Monte Carlo simulations, [53] and dynamical density functional simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most extensively studied geometrical confinements is cylindrical confinement. In particular, some attractive morphologies have been observed in the self-assembly of cylinder-forming AB diblock copolymer melts under the confinement of nanopores by experiments, computer simulations, and theoretical calculations. A common phase sequence has been identified as the pore diameter increases, i.e., single-cylinder (C 1 ), stacked disks (Dk), single-helix (H 1 ), double-helix (H 2 ), and so on. , The fundamental formation mechanism of these helical structures has been well understood. ,,, The confined system tends to maintain a cylindrical domain with the bulk diameter. As a consequence, the length of the cylindrical domain will increase as the confining nanopore expands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%