2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2sm25176k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling the formation of particle-stabilized water-in-oil emulsions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the repulsion forces between the BCS functionalized particles in the "skin" of a droplet with the particles in the "skin" of an adjacent one will contribute to avoid droplet coalescence and maintain a stable emulsion. We have also found that BCS increases the contact angle of water on alumina surfaces (Figure 3e, f), which may increase the energy required to remove the functionalized particle from the oil/water interface [22,33]. It is highly likely that a combination of particle and surfactant (BCSr) stabilization is taking place at the oil/water interface [12].…”
Section: Surface Functionalizationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the repulsion forces between the BCS functionalized particles in the "skin" of a droplet with the particles in the "skin" of an adjacent one will contribute to avoid droplet coalescence and maintain a stable emulsion. We have also found that BCS increases the contact angle of water on alumina surfaces (Figure 3e, f), which may increase the energy required to remove the functionalized particle from the oil/water interface [22,33]. It is highly likely that a combination of particle and surfactant (BCSr) stabilization is taking place at the oil/water interface [12].…”
Section: Surface Functionalizationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A lower amount of particles in the suspensions strongly affects the emulsification, due to a lower viscosity of the continuous phase, and the decrease on the probability to hit the interface and surface coverage. This shifts the mixing conditions from the rupture controlled to the coalescence-controlled domain [22]. Emulsions prepared with low viscosity suspensions (7-25 vol%, Figure 3a) are less stable, leading to creaming and phase separation within an hour when prepared at emulsification speeds below 10,000 rpm.…”
Section: Surface Functionalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pickering emulsion properties such as drop size and porosity are adaptable by varying processing conditions. For example, mixing speed (Gurevitch and Silverstein, 2010;Sturzenegger et al, 2012), particle concentration (Arditty et al, 2003;Binks and Whitby, 2004;Sturzenegger et al, 2012), particle wettability (Akartuna et al, 2008b;Bachinger and Kickelbick, 2010;Chuanuwatanakul et al, 2011;Haase et al, 2011), particle aspect ratio (Vandebril et al, 2010), particle roughness (San-Miguel and Behrens, 2012), and particle size (Binks and Lumsdon, 2001) have all been studied. Such wet emulsions can be shaped, extruded into forms or coated into sheets because of their measurable yield stress Chen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%