The relationship
between experiment and theory in electrocatalysis
is one of profound importance. Until fairly recently, the principal
role of theory in this field was interpreting experimental results.
Over the course of the past decade (roughly the period covered by
this review), however, that has begun to change, with theory now frequently
leading the design of electrocatalytic materials. Though rewarding,
this has not been a particularly easy union. For one thing, experimentalists
and theorists have to come to grips with the fact that they rely on
different models. Theorists make predictions based on individual,
perfect structural models, while experimentalists work with more complex
and heterogeneous ensembles of electrocatalysts. As discussed in this
review, computational capabilities have improved in recent years,
so that theory is better represented by the structures that experimentalists
are able to prepare. Likewise, synthetic chemists are able to make
ever more complex electrocatalysts with high levels of control, which
provide a more extensive palette of materials for testing theory.
The goal of this review is to highlight research from the last ∼10
years that focuses on carefully controlled electrocatalytic experiments
which, in combination with theoretical predictions, bring us closer
to bridging the gap between real catalysts and computational models.