2010
DOI: 10.2217/fca.10.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling the Radiation Dose Received By Patients Undergoing Cardiac Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Until recently, high doses were a major limitation of MDCT as first-line imaging in CABG patients, knowing that some of them will undergo CA and possibly PCI soon after the MDCT. Different techniques are available to obtain a low-dose cardiac MDCT [18,19]. The use of prospective scanning was associated with a 69%-reduction in exposure, from 11.2 to 3.5 mSv, in protection-III study [10].…”
Section: Radiation Dose To Patient During Mdctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, high doses were a major limitation of MDCT as first-line imaging in CABG patients, knowing that some of them will undergo CA and possibly PCI soon after the MDCT. Different techniques are available to obtain a low-dose cardiac MDCT [18,19]. The use of prospective scanning was associated with a 69%-reduction in exposure, from 11.2 to 3.5 mSv, in protection-III study [10].…”
Section: Radiation Dose To Patient During Mdctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appropriation of these techniques by interventional or non-interventional cardiologists, most often untrained in radiation protection, has led to exposing both patient and operator to significant doses of radiation, without a real quality control of the practices. A recent editorial (Georges et al, 2011), "Controlling the radiation dose received by patients undergoing cardiac imaging", emphasizes the need to follow the three steps of radiation protection suggested by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP, 2007): justification, optimization concerning the patient, and dose limitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%