2017
DOI: 10.3103/s0967091217100023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling the surface roughness of cold-rolled strip. Part 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, a roughness of (0.42 ± 0.05) µm could be ensured for 65 % of the material, in contrast to 15% in the uncontrolled case. The heuristic model of Bozhkov et al [22] predicts the resulting strip roughness based on the average contact stress, roll radius and material strength. Here, experimental validation demonstrated that there was an average deviation between measured and predicted strip roughness of 7% with varying strip roughnesses between 1 µm and 2.5 µm over 170 km of strip.…”
Section: Fig 1 Stribeck Curve With the Lubricant's Dynamic Viscosity ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, a roughness of (0.42 ± 0.05) µm could be ensured for 65 % of the material, in contrast to 15% in the uncontrolled case. The heuristic model of Bozhkov et al [22] predicts the resulting strip roughness based on the average contact stress, roll radius and material strength. Here, experimental validation demonstrated that there was an average deviation between measured and predicted strip roughness of 7% with varying strip roughnesses between 1 µm and 2.5 µm over 170 km of strip.…”
Section: Fig 1 Stribeck Curve With the Lubricant's Dynamic Viscosity ...mentioning
confidence: 99%