2018
DOI: 10.5194/bg-2018-472
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controls on redox-sensitive trace metals in the Mauritanian oxygen minimum zone

Abstract: <p><strong>Abstract.</strong> The availability of the micronutrient iron (Fe) in surface waters determines primary production, N<sub>2</sub> fixation and microbial community structure in large parts of the world's ocean, and thus plays an important role in ocean carbon and nitrogen cycles. Eastern boundary upwelling systems and the connected oxygen minimum zones (OMZs) are typically associated with elevated concentrations of redox-sensitive … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(143 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dissolved Mn, Co and Fe are micronutrients, and in Figure 8 fall on the trajectory of the other nutrient‐type elements (e.g., Cd), but less of their variance is explained by PC1, indicating that processes other than biological uptake and remineralization influenced their distributions. While these redox sensitive elements have elevated concentrations in oxygen minimum zones as a result of benthic supply (Bruland et al, 2005; Rapp et al, 2019; Schroller‐Lomnitz et al, 2019), no association with low oxygen is notable in Figure 8 and their variance is not explained by the oxygen/salinity correlated PC2. As might be expected, the dissolved concentrations of Mn, Co, and Fe therefore appear to be determined by a combination of factors including supply strength, biological uptake and remineralization, characteristics and abundance of particles, and water mass age and mixing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dissolved Mn, Co and Fe are micronutrients, and in Figure 8 fall on the trajectory of the other nutrient‐type elements (e.g., Cd), but less of their variance is explained by PC1, indicating that processes other than biological uptake and remineralization influenced their distributions. While these redox sensitive elements have elevated concentrations in oxygen minimum zones as a result of benthic supply (Bruland et al, 2005; Rapp et al, 2019; Schroller‐Lomnitz et al, 2019), no association with low oxygen is notable in Figure 8 and their variance is not explained by the oxygen/salinity correlated PC2. As might be expected, the dissolved concentrations of Mn, Co, and Fe therefore appear to be determined by a combination of factors including supply strength, biological uptake and remineralization, characteristics and abundance of particles, and water mass age and mixing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cd), but less of their variance is explained by PC1, indicating that processes other than biological uptake and remineralization influenced their distributions. Whilst these redox sensitive elements have elevated concentrations in oxygen minimum zones as a result of benthic supply (Bruland et al, 2005;Rapp et al, 2019;Schroller-Lomnitz et al, 2019), no association with low oxygen is notable in Fig. 8 and their variance is not explained by the oxygen/salinity correlated PC2.…”
Section: Ocean Sections Of Dissolved and Total Dissolvable Trace Elementsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Cobalt and Mn are other redox‐sensitive micronutrient trace metals (TMs) that exhibit increased water column concentrations under low oxygen conditions, likely due to enhanced release from sediments and slow oxidation kinetics (Hawco et al, ; Noble et al, ; Rapp et al, ). In contrast, the nonredox sensitive TMs Cd and Ni show oceanic vertical profiles that are strongly regulated by biological uptake and remineralization (Bruland & Lohan, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During October, the concentrations of Ni, Cu, Zn, and Cd were around half or less than half compared to the March campaign. This observation could be related to enhanced TM sequestration by phytoplankton and organic material during and after the productive season (Sundby et al 1986;Kremling et al 1997;Brügmann et al 1998;Pohl and Hennings 2005;Bruland and Lohan 2006;Scholz et al 2011;Noble et al 2012;Rigaud et al 2013;Rapp et al 2019). In addition, more reducing and sulfidic conditions in the bottom water and/or sediment before/during the October campaign may have led to TM removal into sulfide minerals (Sundby et al 1986;Brügmann et al 1998;Pohl and Hennings 2005;Rigaud et al 2013).…”
Section: Comparison Of Tm Concentrations In Near-bottom Water and Wat...mentioning
confidence: 99%