2017
DOI: 10.3354/meps12303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controls on the standing crop of benthic foraminifera at an oceanic scale

Abstract: At present, there is very little basin-scale information on patterns of standing crop in marine organisms or their structuring forces. Understanding modern patterns and controls on foraminifera is particularly critical because of their abundance and importance in benthic systems, as well as their role as palaeoceanographic proxies. Here, we examine for the first time basin-scale patterns and predictors of benthic foraminiferal standing crop from the shelf to abyssal deep sea in the Atlantic Ocean and adjacent … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, definitions of regional stages have begun to prefer biostratigraphic criteria (Piller et al 2007). However, first appearances of marine organisms in isolated basins tend to be affected by significant delays relative to their first appearance GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2018, 69, 3, 283-300 in open ocean environments owing to geographical and environmental constraints (e.g., Kennett et al 1985;Holcová et al 2015;Jones & Murray 2017;Sant et al, 2017a). Therefore, the accuracy of correlations of stage boundaries based on palaeontological criteria in type sections, without any geochronological verification and without understanding of temporal changes in biogeographic distribution of index species, is unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Later, definitions of regional stages have begun to prefer biostratigraphic criteria (Piller et al 2007). However, first appearances of marine organisms in isolated basins tend to be affected by significant delays relative to their first appearance GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2018, 69, 3, 283-300 in open ocean environments owing to geographical and environmental constraints (e.g., Kennett et al 1985;Holcová et al 2015;Jones & Murray 2017;Sant et al, 2017a). Therefore, the accuracy of correlations of stage boundaries based on palaeontological criteria in type sections, without any geochronological verification and without understanding of temporal changes in biogeographic distribution of index species, is unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geodynamic development of the Alpine-Carpathian-Dinaride oro genic systems determined the distribution and extent of terrestrial and marine environments and significantly shaped the sequence architecture, palaeoclimate, and water masses circulation regime of the CP (e.g., Kováč et al 2004Kováč et al , 2017aGrunert et al 2010Grunert et al , 2014ter Borgh et al 2013;Palcu et al 2015). Intensity of marine currents and oceanic circulation patterns strongly impacts biogeographic distribution of plankton and benthos (e.g., Kennett et al 1985;Peters et al 2013;Holcová et al 2015;Jones & Murray 2017;Kováč et al 2017a;Sant et al, 2017a). The timing of faunal appearances thus principally depends on the opening of gateways towards the Mediterranean, or Eastern Paratethys as it is documented from the (sub)recent Mediterranean or Black Sea (e.g., Kouwenhoven & van der Zwaan 2006;Karami et al 2011;Palcu et al 2015;Kováč et al 2017a;Sant et al 2017b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%