2015
DOI: 10.1890/14-2023.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controls over native perennial grass exclusion and persistence in California grasslands invaded by annuals

Abstract: Despite obvious impacts of nonnative species in many ecosystems, the long-term outcome of competition between native and exotic species often remains unclear. Demographic models can resolve the outcome of competition between native and exotic species and provide insight into conditions favoring exclusion vs. coexistence. California grasslands are one of the most heavily invaded ecosystems in North America. Although California native perennial bunchgrasses are thought to be restricted to a fraction of their ori… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings of this study have important implications for understanding historical spread of invasive species in Californian grasslands, and point to cascading effects in invasion with an exotic species (Avena) replacing native species through positive litter feedback effects and successively promoting the expansion of a new invader (Elymus). Previous models of plant invasion principally focused on competition between native and exotic species (Godoy & Levine 2014;Mordecai et al 2015), but our results demonstrate that direct and indirect effects of litter may also play a major role (Foster & Gross 1998;Suding & Goldberg 1999). Evaluating litter feedback effects is particularly important because increasing drought events related to climate change are expected to slow down litter decomposition rates (Henry et al 2008;Santonja et al 2015) and might strengthen the relative importance of litter accumulation (Dukes & Mooney 1999;Bardgett et al 2013) in the next few decades.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Findings of this study have important implications for understanding historical spread of invasive species in Californian grasslands, and point to cascading effects in invasion with an exotic species (Avena) replacing native species through positive litter feedback effects and successively promoting the expansion of a new invader (Elymus). Previous models of plant invasion principally focused on competition between native and exotic species (Godoy & Levine 2014;Mordecai et al 2015), but our results demonstrate that direct and indirect effects of litter may also play a major role (Foster & Gross 1998;Suding & Goldberg 1999). Evaluating litter feedback effects is particularly important because increasing drought events related to climate change are expected to slow down litter decomposition rates (Henry et al 2008;Santonja et al 2015) and might strengthen the relative importance of litter accumulation (Dukes & Mooney 1999;Bardgett et al 2013) in the next few decades.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…However, a disturbance that is severe enough to kill Stipa adults and allow the establishment of Avena can shift basins of attraction towards an Avena state where Stipa is not able to reinvade, as Stipa populations rely primarily on adult survival than an intact seedbank to buffer population size (Mordecai et al . ). These dynamics likely occur during type conversions following severe fires (Larios, Aicher & Suding ), and suggest that practices that protect remnants from severe disturbances should be high priority for these areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Because we are simulating population size for two life stages of Stipa – seedlings and adults – we created a matrix describing the transition between seedling and adult and calculated GRWR as the dominant eigenvalue of the matrix of transitions rates between these two life stages (Mordecai ; Mordecai et al . ). The communities would be considered separate states if the invader could not increase when rare, while the other species is at equilibrium.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations