2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controversies in defining cardiac antibody-mediated rejection: Need for updated criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence across solid-organ transplantation suggests that AMR confers worse long-term outcomes and predisposes to chronic allograft dysfunction. [30][31][32][33][34][35] Prevention and treatment of AMR requires optimization to prevent long-term graft loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence across solid-organ transplantation suggests that AMR confers worse long-term outcomes and predisposes to chronic allograft dysfunction. [30][31][32][33][34][35] Prevention and treatment of AMR requires optimization to prevent long-term graft loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 -18 As recognition of the presence of AMR becomes commonplace, a critical need to develop common definitions, standardized workup of biopsies, and reproducible diagnostic criteria and answer key questions has emerged. 19,20 In 2005, the ISHLT revised the 1990 working formulation for the standardization of heart transplant rejection. 2 An important component of this revision was the official recognition of AMR as a distinct rejection entity, which included histologic parameters, such as activated endothelial cells and intravascular macrophages, immunphenotypic evidence of capillary C4d deposition, and correlation with clinical parameters such as graft dysfunction and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibody production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Characterized by host antibodies targeting human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules, blood group antigens, and endothelial cells in the donor tissue, 2 the long-term effects are not fully understood. Although pioneering work on AMR by Hammond et al 3 was described in 1989, AMR failed to be recognized as a definite entity until 2005, when it was included in the rejection nomenclature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 AMR is a significant risk factor for poor outcomes after organ transplantation and is associated with, increased mortality, increased graft loss, and accelerated allograft coronary artery disease. [1][2][3][4][5][6] Risk factors for AMR include prior antibody exposure, multiparity, repeat transplantation, blood transfusions, use of ventricular assist devices, positive B-cell flow cytometry crossmatch, and elevated panel-reactive antibodies. AMR appears to be on the rise, likely secondary to changing trends in clinical practice, including selection of patients for transplantation on mechanical circulatory support and the development of more effective combinations of immunosuppressive drugs against acute cellular rejection (ACR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation