Controversies in modern evolutionary biology: the imperative for error detection and quality control

Abstract

BackgroundThe data from high throughput genomics technologies provide unique opportunities for studies of complex biological systems, but also pose many new challenges. The shift to the genome scale in evolutionary biology, for example, has led to many interesting, but often controversial studies. It has been suggested that part of the conflict may be due to errors in the initial sequences. Most gene sequences are predicted by bioinformatics programs and a number of quality issues have been raised, concerning DNA sequencing errors or badly predicted coding regions, particularly in eukaryotes.ResultsWe investigated the impact of these errors on evolutionary studies and specifically on the identification of important genetic events. We focused on the detection of asymmetric evolution after duplication, which has been the subject of controversy recently. Using the human genome as a reference, we established a reliable set of 688 duplicated genes in 13 complete vertebrate genomes, where significantly different evolutionary rates are observed. We estimated the rates at which protein sequence errors occur and are accumulated in the higher-level analyses. We showed that the majority of the detected events (57%) are in fact artifacts due to the putative erroneous sequences and that these artifacts are sufficient to mask the true functional significance of the events.ConclusionsInitial errors are accumulated throughout the evolutionary analysis, generating artificially high rates of event predictions and leading to substantial uncertainty in the conclusions. This study emphasizes the urgent need for error detection and quality control strategies in order to efficiently extract knowledge from the new genome data.

Allostery Wiring Map for Kinesin Energy Transduction and Its Evolution

“…At the initiation of this study, >3000 sequences were reported. However, 40% of sequences in public databases have either sequencing or annotation errors ( 19 – 21 ). By their own record, no SCA study ( supplemental Table S1 ) described filtering of sequence entries for errors; only removal of sequences with particular forms of divergence (indels, or insertions and deletions) is documented.…”

Orthologues, Paralogues and Horizontal Gene Transfer in the Human Holobiont

“…In asymmetric evolution after duplication, one duplicate evolves or degrades faster than the other and often becomes functionally or conditionally specialised. In a study on asymmetrically duplicated genes, confirmed duplicated gene sets identified across 13 vertebrate genomes were enriched in functional categories related to neuron differentiation and response to external stimuli (Prosdocimi et al, 2012).…”

Reconstruction of the carbohydrate 6-O sulfotransferase gene family evolution in vertebrates reveals novel member, CHST16, lost in amniotes

“…In most cases (excluding transcriptome data), corresponding 151 gene models could be found and their database IDs were recorded. In cases where no gene 152 models could be identified, or where they included errors (Prosdocimi et al 2012), C6OST 153 sequences were predicted/corrected by manual inspection of their corresponding genomic 154 regions, including flanking regions and introns. Exons were curated with respect to consensus 155 sequences for splice donor/acceptor sites (Rogozin et al 2012;Abril et al 2005) and start of 156 translation (Nakagawa et al 2008), as well as sequence homology to other C6OST family 157…”