2008
DOI: 10.1186/1740-2557-5-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controversies in the antiphospholipid syndrome: can we ever stop warfarin?

Abstract: Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome are at increased risk for recurrent arterial and venous thrombosis and therefore benefit from long term warfarin therapy. The optimal duration of warfarin therapy after a first venous thromboembolic event is however a matter of some controversy and many questions remain unanswered. After reviewing and analysing the available evidence, we discuss some common scenarios in everyday clinical practice where treatment decisions are difficult.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The only proven treatment option is long-term anticoagulation with warfarin [143,144]. However, drugs used for other aspects of adult SLE may also modify this condition.…”
Section: Antiphospholipid Syndromementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The only proven treatment option is long-term anticoagulation with warfarin [143,144]. However, drugs used for other aspects of adult SLE may also modify this condition.…”
Section: Antiphospholipid Syndromementioning
confidence: 98%
“…They are diverse for those with primary and secondary thromboembolic events, as well as for those with positive aPL antibodies but no known evidence of thromboses or pregnancy morbidity. Current recommendations for secondary thrombosis prevention in APS are for lifelong warfarin 4 …”
Section: Results Of Anti‐phospholipid Antibody Tests For the Three Pamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current recommendations for secondary thrombosis prevention in APS are for lifelong warfarin. 4 The following case reports highlight the difficulty in making a definite diagnosis of APS and the consequences of cessation of anticoagulation in known APS leading to CAPS, and hence further morbidity and mortality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The target INR advised in all recent reviews on secondary prophylaxis after a first VTE in APS patients [12][13][14][15][16] is at moderate intensity (target INR 2.5), which is similar to common practice in the general population. The basis for this recommendation for all reviews was the results of two prospective, randomized trials that compared high and moderate intensity anticoagulation in APS patients with a first VTE.…”
Section: Thrombotic Apsmentioning
confidence: 89%