2016
DOI: 10.1111/anae.13487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controversies in the peripartum management of diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We support the upper limit of 8 mmol/l in the peripartum period , as recommended by Barrett et al . .…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…We support the upper limit of 8 mmol/l in the peripartum period , as recommended by Barrett et al . .…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…It may not be unreasonable therefore to relax target CBGs to 4-8 mmol/L or even 6-8 mmol/L where hypoglycaemia can have disastrous consequences. 9 However, further research is urgently needed to confirm that such relaxation would not have a deleterious effect on the neonatal outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 They also raised concerns that maintaining tight glycaemic control in the range of 4-7 mmol/L may increase maternal hypoglycaemia and resource burden without any clear reduction in neonatal hypoglycaemia. 8,9 Our local protocol is to monitor capillary blood glucose (CBG) hourly from the onset of labour in all women with diabetes. If CBGs rise above 7 mmol/L, the variable rate intravenous insulin infusion (VRIII) is commenced ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This stringent target range is based on the rationale that hyperglycaemia during the peripartum period increases the risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia. The literature cited by NICE supporting this notion was mostly published more than 20 years ago, before the advent of improved glycaemic control during pregnancy . More recent data, including a systematic review , the prospective trial by Yamamoto et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parturients represent a high‐risk group as maternal hyperglycaemia is associated with an increased incidence of miscarriage, sepsis and pre‐eclampsia and, as gestational diabetes is associated with obesity and increased maternal age, they are at further risk of complications . Furthermore, neonates of parturients with diabetes are at greater risk of hypoglycaemia, macrosomia, birth injuries, congenital abnormalities and peri‐natal mortality .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%