2021
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10020165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controversy about the Role of Rifampin in Biofilm Infections: Is It Justified?

Abstract: Rifampin is a potent antibiotic against staphylococcal implant-associated infections. In the absence of implants, current data suggest against the use of rifampin combinations. In the past decades, abundant preclinical and clinical evidence has accumulated supporting its role in biofilm-related infections.In the present article, experimental data from animal models of foreign-body infections and clinical trials are reviewed. The risk for emergence of rifampin resistance and multiple drug interactions are empha… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aside from TB, rifampicin is used in the treatment of leprosy [31], pneumococcal meningitis [32], as well as Staphylococcus and Legionella infections [33,34]. In the case of staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections, the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends inclusion of rifampicin as part of combination treatments [7,8]; however, results published recently from a randomized controlled trial has called into question its utility in those scenarios [35], which has sparked debate on the topic [36]. Rifabutin was identified in 1980 and approved for the treatment of infections caused by the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) [2,37].…”
Section: Discovery and Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from TB, rifampicin is used in the treatment of leprosy [31], pneumococcal meningitis [32], as well as Staphylococcus and Legionella infections [33,34]. In the case of staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections, the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends inclusion of rifampicin as part of combination treatments [7,8]; however, results published recently from a randomized controlled trial has called into question its utility in those scenarios [35], which has sparked debate on the topic [36]. Rifabutin was identified in 1980 and approved for the treatment of infections caused by the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) [2,37].…”
Section: Discovery and Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the first-line antituberculosis drugs, rifampicin is mainly used in antituberculosis treatment, although has been extensively investigated for use against nonmycobacterial microorganisms such as Staphylococcus for at least 50 years [52]. However, the effect of rifampicin on nonmycobacterial infection is controversial [53]. In a study by Zimmerli et al [54], rifampicin was added to ciprofloxacin in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to treat implant-related infection; 18 patients were allocated to ciprofloxacin-rifampin and 15 patients to ciprofloxacinplacebo.…”
Section: Rifampicinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…67 In addition to oral antibiotics targeted against the causative organisms, there is also sufficiently strong evidence demonstrating that rifampin is a beneficial addition to the chronic suppression regimen due to its efficacy against biofilms, particularly staphylococcal biofilm infections. 68,69…”
Section: Chronic Suppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%