2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2022.114622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conventional and nanotechnology based sensors for creatinine (A kidney biomarker) detection: A consolidated review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development and application of modified electrodes with various materials have made the field of electrochemical sensor research flourish [ 29 , 30 ]. Many electrochemical sensors have been developed for the determination of uric acid and creatinine [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ]. Among these electrochemical biosensors, non-enzymatic sensors have gained much attention due to their low-cost, simplicity, accuracy and portability [ 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development and application of modified electrodes with various materials have made the field of electrochemical sensor research flourish [ 29 , 30 ]. Many electrochemical sensors have been developed for the determination of uric acid and creatinine [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ]. Among these electrochemical biosensors, non-enzymatic sensors have gained much attention due to their low-cost, simplicity, accuracy and portability [ 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the major focus is given on the nonclinical biomarkers such as NAG, NGAL, KIM-1, and interleukin-18 (IL-18), cystatin C, β-2microglobulin, L-FABP, and so forth, (Derin & Inci, 2022). In another review by Jayasekhar Babu et al (2022) the major discussion is based on the creatinine biosensors advancement based on nanotechnology tools (Jayasekhar Babu et al, 2022). Although these reviews are important, they have been focused either on various nonclinical molecules or on nearly a single type of CKD biomarker.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another review by Jayasekhar Babu et al. (2022) the major discussion is based on the creatinine biosensors advancement based on nanotechnology tools (Jayasekhar Babu et al, 2022). Although these reviews are important, they have been focused either on various nonclinical molecules or on nearly a single type of CKD biomarker.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reasons make it difficult to popularize the detection of creatinine by HPLC 9,12,13 . One of the main trends in detecting creatinine is by enzyme binding other sensors, and the enzyme system becomes the more reported creatinine sensor due of its high selectivity [14][15][16] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%