2009
DOI: 10.1002/maco.200805150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conventional and pulse cathodic protection of reinforced concrete: Electrochemical behavior of the steel reinforcement after corrosion and protection

Abstract: The applicability and efficiency of an alternative for impressed current cathodic protection (CP) for reinforced concrete, based on pulse technology, was investigated. The technique, denoted as pulse CP (pCP), was evaluated on the basis of a comparative analysis to reference (non-corroding), corroding, and conventional CP conditions, in terms of long-term monitoring of electrochemical parameters for the embedded steel with time of corrosion and protection. The hereby reported results are for the total duration… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…44 These preliminary investigations did not fully reveal whether the nanoaggregates were indeed present at the steel/cement paste interface and/or on the steel surface ͑considering the nanosize of the formations and the variety of cement hydration/corrosion products on the steel surface͒. Although steel corrosion in cement-based materials was substantially studied and results were reported ͑including some of the present authors͒, [45][46][47] the remaining fact is that the system reinforced mortar ͑and concrete, respectively͒ is highly heterogeneous and complicated by itself. Therefore, the presence of nanoaggregates ͑as hereby discussed͒ leads to even more complexity in deriving electrochemical response for the steel reinforcement or within the steel surface analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…44 These preliminary investigations did not fully reveal whether the nanoaggregates were indeed present at the steel/cement paste interface and/or on the steel surface ͑considering the nanosize of the formations and the variety of cement hydration/corrosion products on the steel surface͒. Although steel corrosion in cement-based materials was substantially studied and results were reported ͑including some of the present authors͒, [45][46][47] the remaining fact is that the system reinforced mortar ͑and concrete, respectively͒ is highly heterogeneous and complicated by itself. Therefore, the presence of nanoaggregates ͑as hereby discussed͒ leads to even more complexity in deriving electrochemical response for the steel reinforcement or within the steel surface analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…ICCP of atmospherically exposed steel reinforced concrete structures has been used since 1970s and it is a proven technique which is able to arrest ongoing corrosion and induce and sustain steel passivity [1]. The main principle of cathodic protection is applying an impressed current such as to induce negative steel polarisation [2], in other words to drive the steel potentials more cathodically than -850 mV (SCE), where corrosion process is thermodynamically impossible to occur [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, 3). Moreover, the higher chloride concentration, is not a result of higher porosity, since both OPCcorr and PoOPCcorr present approximately 12% porosity at 320 days of age (6). Obviously hydration mechanisms were altered as a result of the presence of the micelles, leading to increased chloride threshold in the specimens and thus impeded corrosion products formation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%