Conventional Biometrics and Hidden Biometric: A Comparative Study

Bhatnagar, Shaleen; Mishra, Nidhi

doi:10.1007/978-981-15-7062-9_47

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…But this also means not leveraging technological innovations for operational benefit. Furthermore, although MSF does not use any automated identification system, 'hidden biometrics' such as knee X-rays and brain prints are increasingly recognised as unique identification methods (Shamir et al, 2009;Bhatnagar and Mishra, 2020). Moreover, UNHCR and WFP retain beneficiary data for a longer time as compared to other HOs.…”

Section: Emerging Trends and Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

‘I know you like the back of my hand’: biometric practices of humanitarian organisations in international aid

Açιkyιldιz

2023

Disasters

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Humanitarian organizations are increasingly utilizing biometric data. However, we know little about the extent and scope of this practice, as its benefits and risks have attracted all the attention so far. This paper explores the biometric practices of the UN Refugee Agency, the United Nations World Food Programme, the International Committee of the Red Cross, Médecins Sans Frontières, and World Vision International. The paper analyzed relevant documents published over the past two decades and 17 semi‐structured interviews with humanitarian workers conducted between June 2021 and June 2022. The findings display that humanitarian organizations use diverse types and functions of biometric data for different services, collaborate with many actors, and use various data protection measures. Ultimately, challenging the straightforward generalizations about the use of such data, the paper argues that variational applications of biometrics in the humanitarian context require case‐by‐case analysis, as each use case will likely produce a different outcome.

show abstract

Section: Emerging Trends and Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%