2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conventional Glycaemic Control May Not Be Beneficial in Diabetic Patients Following Cardiac Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 99 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous meta-analysis including 12 965 patients from 11 cohort studies showed that diabetes may be an independent risk factor of mortality in patients after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) [3]. Subsequent studies indicated that the influence of diabetes on the prognosis of patients after cardiac surgery is complicated, which may also be influenced by the strategy of blood control [4,5]. It was shown that compared with moderate glycemic control strategy (7.8-10.0 mmol/l) in patients with diabetes undergoing cardiac surgery, who maintained strict glycemic control (7.8 mmol/l), was associated with lower risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) and sternal wound infection, although there was no significant differences in postoperative mortality, stroke, and hypoglycemic episodes [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous meta-analysis including 12 965 patients from 11 cohort studies showed that diabetes may be an independent risk factor of mortality in patients after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) [3]. Subsequent studies indicated that the influence of diabetes on the prognosis of patients after cardiac surgery is complicated, which may also be influenced by the strategy of blood control [4,5]. It was shown that compared with moderate glycemic control strategy (7.8-10.0 mmol/l) in patients with diabetes undergoing cardiac surgery, who maintained strict glycemic control (7.8 mmol/l), was associated with lower risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) and sternal wound infection, although there was no significant differences in postoperative mortality, stroke, and hypoglycemic episodes [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%