1974
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(74)90019-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conventional Occlusion Vs. Pleoptics in the Treatment of Amblyopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study of this kind, Veronneau‐Troutman, Dayanoff and Stohler 44 compared conventional (direct) occlusion in a group of 53 children aged from five to 14 years, with pleoptic therapy combined with inverse occlusion in 37 children, aged from five to 13 years. Before treatment, the visual acuity of the amblyopic eye was statistically similar in the two groups and was no better than 6/18 in any of the subjects (average values not given).…”
Section: Active Treatment Of Amblyopiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study of this kind, Veronneau‐Troutman, Dayanoff and Stohler 44 compared conventional (direct) occlusion in a group of 53 children aged from five to 14 years, with pleoptic therapy combined with inverse occlusion in 37 children, aged from five to 13 years. Before treatment, the visual acuity of the amblyopic eye was statistically similar in the two groups and was no better than 6/18 in any of the subjects (average values not given).…”
Section: Active Treatment Of Amblyopiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…71 The other five prospective CCTs that were found compared different approaches to amblyopia treatment. [74][75][76][77][78] The studies that compared treatment with CAM gratings and either blank discs (instead of gratings) 76 or occlusion 74 found no significant difference in visual acuity between the groups after treatment. Small improvements in visual acuity were seen but the small number of participants in each study limits the value of the findings.…”
Section: Study Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occlusion has been found to be more effective in younger children but it also requires more overall treatment time than required for pleoptics. 36 Practically, pleoptic therapy is very difficult to perform with young children. One important point that should be stressed is that pleoptic studies were generally used on older patients with poorer initial visual acuity and with larger degrees of eccentric fixation, so that a bias in favour of occlusion therapy is evident.…”
Section: Pleopticsmentioning
confidence: 99%