2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conventional plate fixation versus minimally invasive modified pedicle screw-rod fixation for anterior pelvic ring fractures

Abstract: There are various methods of fixation for anterior pelvic ring fractures. We report our experience with modified pedicle screw-rod fixation (MPSRF) via a minimally invasive method. Fourteen patients with anterior pelvic ring fracture were treated by internal fixation (conventional plate fixation, n = 7; MPSRF, n = 7). Intraoperative blood loss, operative time, post-operative fracture reduction grading by radiography, and complication rates were compared and statistically analyzed. Patients treated with MPSRF h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is believed that the internal fixator system is suitable for the minimally invasive treatment of anterior ring fractures and has achieved good results [ 21 , 22 ]. Among its advantages are it being a simple operation with minimal trauma and little impact on daily life [ 23 , 24 ]. Liu et al [ 25 , 26 ] performed biomechanical research by using pelvic finite element models and cadaveric specimens to construct two-screw, three-screw and four-screw anterior ring internal fixator systems and a screw-plate system combined with a sacroiliac screw for Tile C3 pelvic fracture fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is believed that the internal fixator system is suitable for the minimally invasive treatment of anterior ring fractures and has achieved good results [ 21 , 22 ]. Among its advantages are it being a simple operation with minimal trauma and little impact on daily life [ 23 , 24 ]. Liu et al [ 25 , 26 ] performed biomechanical research by using pelvic finite element models and cadaveric specimens to construct two-screw, three-screw and four-screw anterior ring internal fixator systems and a screw-plate system combined with a sacroiliac screw for Tile C3 pelvic fracture fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the surgery using MIPPO technology combined with LCP guided by C-arm X-ray machine, the indirect reduction and percutaneous plate insertion can effectively avoid periosteal dissection, reduce the damage of surgery to blood supply at the fracture site, which is conducive to the postoperative recovery of patients 19 , 20 ; There is no additional requirement of external fixation when using MIPPO technology combined with LCP, which may benefit early postoperative rehabilitation training, so as to improve the curative effect of the fracture patients 21 ; Compared with traditional anatomical plate, LCP has less pressure on periosteum, with almost no damage to periosteum, which may help to maintain the blood supply at the fracture end, so as to promote the improvement of the curative effect of patients. Simultaneously, in view of the comparison of surgical indicators between groups, the use of MIPPO technology combined with LCP guided by C-arm X-ray machine exhibited a more significant effect on reducing the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, and healing time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, minimally invasive techniques for closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of pelvic fractures have made great progress [20][21][22][23]. On the basis of the Day classification, we tried to apply percutaneous sacroiliac joint screws plus posterior iliac screws to treat type II CFD, achieving the purpose of minimally invasive treatment [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%