2015
DOI: 10.1097/icl.0000000000000093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conventional Versus Accelerated Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus

Abstract: : Collagen cross-linking (CXL) is a procedure that primarily aims to increase corneal stiffness. Although used for a variety of conditions, it is most commonly applied to the treatment of keratoconus. Collagen cross-linking involves irradiation of the cornea with ultraviolet A (UVA) irradiation after it has been soaked with riboflavin (vitamin B), a photosensitizer. In conventional treatment, based on the Dresden protocol, a minimum corneal thickness threshold of 400 μm is recommended and UVA (370 nm) irradiat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are a few preliminary reports that suggest accelerated CXL may be comparable to conventional CXL in terms of safety (measured by failure, loss of vision, and endothelial cell loss) and efficacy (measured by improvement in best corrected visual acuity and K values), these are mostly smaller studies with short-term follow-up (6-18 months). 22 Evaluation of CXL efficacy using the stromal demarcation line as a clinical marker has shown a significantly shallower depth of cross-linking in high-intensity, accelerated protocols compared with the conventional treatment, 23,24 which is corroborated by our data showing a greater demarcation line depth in group F (30 minutes, CXL + device) compared with group D (10 minutes, CXL + device). Moreover, our experimental results showing only a significant decrease in corneal curvature with our device after 30 minutes CXL (3 times the conventional CXL dose) but not after 10 minutes UV treatment (accelerated CXL protocol) may hint at limitations to the accelerated protocol, particularly if attempts are to be made to combine CXL with other simultaneous procedures that may require a minimum treatment time (eg, our corneal-shaping device).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although there are a few preliminary reports that suggest accelerated CXL may be comparable to conventional CXL in terms of safety (measured by failure, loss of vision, and endothelial cell loss) and efficacy (measured by improvement in best corrected visual acuity and K values), these are mostly smaller studies with short-term follow-up (6-18 months). 22 Evaluation of CXL efficacy using the stromal demarcation line as a clinical marker has shown a significantly shallower depth of cross-linking in high-intensity, accelerated protocols compared with the conventional treatment, 23,24 which is corroborated by our data showing a greater demarcation line depth in group F (30 minutes, CXL + device) compared with group D (10 minutes, CXL + device). Moreover, our experimental results showing only a significant decrease in corneal curvature with our device after 30 minutes CXL (3 times the conventional CXL dose) but not after 10 minutes UV treatment (accelerated CXL protocol) may hint at limitations to the accelerated protocol, particularly if attempts are to be made to combine CXL with other simultaneous procedures that may require a minimum treatment time (eg, our corneal-shaping device).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Previously, RFpromoted photo-oxidation has been applied to periodontal wound healing using a dental curing light [25]. Furthermore, RF-based collagen crosslinking is currently being used for cornea tissue and cartilage tissue engineering [26,27]. Our results support the notion that collagenous biomaterials can be rapidly photo-crosslinked when exposed to UV light in the presence of RF.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Additionally, silencing COL3A1 expression in vitro inhibited glioma cell proliferation and migration. This might be closely related to the following three primary functions of collagen in brain tumors: to act as: i) a scaffold and provide sites for cell adhesion; ii) a reservoir for extracellular matrix proteins, proteoglycans and growth factors; and iii) a ligand to activate signal transduction networks required for tumor growth, differentiation and invasion (25)(26)(27)(28)(29). Although the underlying mechanism for these effects still needs to be studied, our results gave a hint on the role of COL3A1 in collagen and brain tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%