“…Although there are a few preliminary reports that suggest accelerated CXL may be comparable to conventional CXL in terms of safety (measured by failure, loss of vision, and endothelial cell loss) and efficacy (measured by improvement in best corrected visual acuity and K values), these are mostly smaller studies with short-term follow-up (6-18 months). 22 Evaluation of CXL efficacy using the stromal demarcation line as a clinical marker has shown a significantly shallower depth of cross-linking in high-intensity, accelerated protocols compared with the conventional treatment, 23,24 which is corroborated by our data showing a greater demarcation line depth in group F (30 minutes, CXL + device) compared with group D (10 minutes, CXL + device). Moreover, our experimental results showing only a significant decrease in corneal curvature with our device after 30 minutes CXL (3 times the conventional CXL dose) but not after 10 minutes UV treatment (accelerated CXL protocol) may hint at limitations to the accelerated protocol, particularly if attempts are to be made to combine CXL with other simultaneous procedures that may require a minimum treatment time (eg, our corneal-shaping device).…”