2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.02.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conventional versus additive manufacturing in the structural performance of dense alumina-zirconia ceramics: 20 years of research, challenges and future perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 359 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of conventional fabrication methods include gel casting [4], direct foaming [5], isostatic pressing [6], slip casting [7], etc. AM methods could perform better in creating ceramic components with complex geometries and designs [8]. Examples of AM processes include stereolithography [9], direct ink writing [10], binder jetting [11], and selective laser sintering [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of conventional fabrication methods include gel casting [4], direct foaming [5], isostatic pressing [6], slip casting [7], etc. AM methods could perform better in creating ceramic components with complex geometries and designs [8]. Examples of AM processes include stereolithography [9], direct ink writing [10], binder jetting [11], and selective laser sintering [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to assess and analyze recent review articles in this area, a Scopus search was conducted in April 2023 for the specific time frame of 2018–2023. This search resulted in 165 review articles on ceramic additive manufacturing or some subset of that topic 1,3–166 . Figure 1 shows a graphical representation of the number of review articles separated into five focus areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 These methods are limited in shape complexity and often require specialized tooling and several postprocessing steps; both of which are costly in time and resources. 6,7 Additive Manufacturing (AM) offers a unique approach to producing ceramic near-net and complex-shaped parts, which are not otherwise achievable through conventional means. 8 Additionally, AM allows for rapidly prototyping more conventional designs at a much lower cost since it does not require the expensive tooling that is necessary for traditional ceramic processing such as injection molding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,[20][21][22] In order to densify the printed part, the resin is thermally or chemically removed first, often leading to gas/bubble formation, interlayer delamination, and cracking during sintering. 7,23,24 Consequently, DLP is limited by part thickness and offers limited solutions for parts with geometric features greater than ∼10 mm in any direction. 24 It is therefore realized that the thermal debind process is one of the critical processes that can be investigated to help reduce interlayer delamination and cracking of a final component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%