Conventional versus 'all-inside' anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial comparing hamstring strength and functional outcome

Ashraf, Y.; Senevirathna, Shanaka R; Ashraf, T

doi:10.1302/2633-1462.111.bjo-2020-0012.r1

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Reconstructive techniques have evolved during the past 60 years through anteromedial bundle reconstruction, double-bundle reconstruction, and an 'all-inside' technique, to more recent biological or synthetic augmentation with preservation of the ACL remnant. 1,[18][19][20][21][22] Computer-assisted navigation in ACL reconstruction, with the aim of improving the position of the tunnels and improving rotatory stability, is a goal for some techniques. 23,24 These have helped patients to regain a stable knee and return to sports.…”

Section: Is the Die Cast? Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury And Osteo...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Is the die cast? Anterior cruciate ligament injury and osteoarthritis

Rajput

Haddad

2022

The Bone & Joint Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Is the Die Cast? Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury And Osteo...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Is the die cast? Anterior cruciate ligament injury and osteoarthritis

Rajput

Haddad

2022

The Bone & Joint Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Recent single-surgeon comparison research indicated that the strength of the knee with all-inside ACL restoration was superior, but the functional result was comparable. 8 The all-inside ACL reconstruction with an ST4 autograft and cortical button fixation on both ends is a viable alternative to the conventional technique. 9 Before tensioning, the graft of the all-inside technique should be 50 to 70 mm long, with a maximum length of 75 mm after tensioning.…”

Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

All-inside vs. conventional method in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis

Rante

Santoso

Sibarani

et al. 2022

IJBS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was prevalent among sports, with a female predominance. If not treated properly, ACL deficiency knee can cause significant morbidity and long-term impairment. The most often utilized reconstructive methods in modern clinical practice were conventional and all-inside treatments. This study compared all-inside and conventional ACL reconstruction methods through systematic review and meta-analysis. Method: The searching protocol was carried out using several databases, such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, to identify relevant topics in May 2022. This study used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2020 (PRISMA) guidelines. Result: There were 17 studies included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. All of the reviewed studies were written in English. Most of the included studies were carried out in Europe. Theafollowaup duration range from 3amonthsato 4ayears. The total participants were 2329 patients with ACL reconstructions. There was a significant difference between groups in the overall analysis, with the all-inside technique having higher Lysholm score outcomes than the conventional technique (MD = 1.87; 95% CI = 0.41–3.33; p < 0.05) Conclusion: All-inside technique has higher Lysohlm score outcome than the conventional technique. There is no significant difference in pain and IKDC score between both groups.

show abstract

“…The all-inside technique (AIT) for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is gaining popularity as a more anatomic, less invasive technique with the potential for more rapid recovery. This systematic review aims to critically assess components of the technique its safety profile, outcomes and complications 7 . The goal of the all-inside method is to minimize surgical trauma.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pain assessment after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft: quadrupled m.semitendinosus versus m.semitendinosusand m.gracilis

Nestorovski,

Vangelovska,

Ilieva

2023

Arch Pub Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Anteriorcruciate ligament (ACL) tear is one of the most common sports injuries. The all-inside technique (AIT) for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is gaining popularity as a more anatomic, less invasive technique with the potential for more rapid recovery. With the recent advances in the field of sports medicine, the all-inside technique is reported to have less postoperative pain as compared to the conventional transportable procedure. The purpose of this research is to determine the differences in acute pain levels between undergoing ACL reconstruction hamstring autograft m. semitendinosusand m.gracilis versus hamstring autograft quadrupled m.semitendinosus in first and second postoperative day. Materials and Methods: A total of 80 patients in period of two years who underwent primary ACL reconstruction using either HS autograft m.semitendinosusand m.gracilis or HS autograft quadrupled m.semitendinosus consented to participate. The primary outcome of the study was postoperative pain levels that were collected after surgery at first and second day. For the quantification of the intensity of pain after the surgery the patients were offered a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS scale), numbered from 0 to 10 (0 means no pain, 10 is the strongest pain). This part of the research shows the results obtained by processing patients with ACL, treated at the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology in the City General Hospital "8th of September" in Skopje. Results: The average postoperative score one day after surgery for patients with a standard method using a graft in the form of a duplication of m.semitendinosus and m.gracilis based on the VAS scale was 7.70 +0.9 and the score second day after surgery was 4.75 + 1.1.The average postoperative score a day after the surgery for patients treated with the method where only m.semitendinosus is used as a graft and that in the form of quadruplicationbased on the VAS scale was 3.90 +3.1and the score second day after surgery was 2.70 +2.7. Conclusion: A significant reduction in acute postoperative pain was found when performing ACL reconstruction with HS quadrupledm.semitendinosus compared to HS m.semitendinosus-m.gracilis.

show abstract

Conventional versus 'all-inside' anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial comparing hamstring strength and functional outcome

Abstract: Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-11:706–708.

Cited by 7 publications

References 9 publications

Is the die cast? Anterior cruciate ligament injury and osteoarthritis

Is the die cast? Anterior cruciate ligament injury and osteoarthritis

All-inside vs. conventional method in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis

Pain assessment after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft: quadrupled m.semitendinosus versus m.semitendinosusand m.gracilis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About