2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conventional versus Doxorubicin-eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
185
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
9
185
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite reports suggested that there was no significant difference in terms of the safety profile, tumor response, tumor recurrence and overall survival rate for DEB as compared to TACE in non-transplant patients (57,59), DEB was shown to have lower tumor recurrence rate after LT and was identified as an independent predictor of recurrence-free survival in the multivariate analysis (60). Further study should be carried out to confirm the superiority of this technique.…”
Section: Doxorubicin Eluting Bead (Deb) Transarterial Chemoembolizatimentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Despite reports suggested that there was no significant difference in terms of the safety profile, tumor response, tumor recurrence and overall survival rate for DEB as compared to TACE in non-transplant patients (57,59), DEB was shown to have lower tumor recurrence rate after LT and was identified as an independent predictor of recurrence-free survival in the multivariate analysis (60). Further study should be carried out to confirm the superiority of this technique.…”
Section: Doxorubicin Eluting Bead (Deb) Transarterial Chemoembolizatimentioning
confidence: 95%
“…None of those trials demonstrated a difference in survival, but patients treated with drug-eluting bead tace consistently experienced fewer adverse events [69][70][71][72] .…”
Section: Summary Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated to have a lower toxicity profile compared to cTACE [79] . However, studies so far failed to prove its ability to consistently prolong survival [79][80][81][82][83][84] . Moreover, as a relatively new agent, only a paucity of studies has looked at its effect on high-burden HCC, particularly those with portal vein invasion.…”
Section: Transarterial Chemoembolizationmentioning
confidence: 99%